[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/gt: move remaining debugfs interfaces into gt
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Mar 31 16:53:32 UTC 2020
Quoting Andi Shyti (2020-03-31 17:45:08)
> +static void intel_sseu_copy_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
> + int slice, u8 *to_mask)
> +{
> + int offset = slice * sseu->ss_stride;
> +
> + memcpy(&to_mask[offset], &sseu->subslice_mask[offset], sseu->ss_stride);
> +}
Worth moving all the sseu into their file? There's quite a few of them
and each quite chunky.
> +static int interrupt_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
And if we start there, we might end up with debugfs_gt_irq.c as well?
(Not that I see any use for this debugfs info :)
> +static int reset_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> +{
> + struct intel_gt *gt = data;
> + int ret = intel_gt_terminally_wedged(gt);
> +
> + switch (ret) {
> + case -EIO:
> + *val = 1;
> + return 0;
> + case 0:
> + *val = 0;
> + return 0;
> + default:
> + return ret;
> + }
reset_get? Ok if you document it as reporting wedged status :)
> +}
> +
> +static int reset_set(void *data, u64 val)
> +{
> + struct intel_gt *gt = data;
> +
> + /* Flush any previous reset before applying for a new one */
> + wait_event(gt->reset.queue,
> + !test_bit(I915_RESET_BACKOFF, >->reset.flags));
> +
> + intel_gt_handle_error(gt, val, I915_ERROR_CAPTURE,
> + "Manually set wedged engine mask = %llx", val);
No hint of i915_wedged any more. Just "Manual reset engine mask %llx",
or somesuch will do.
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list