[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: check to see if SIMD registers are available before using SIMD

David Laight David.Laight at ACULAB.COM
Fri May 1 11:34:26 UTC 2020

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> Sent: 01 May 2020 11:42
> On 2020-04-30 16:10:16 [-0600], Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Sometimes it's not okay to use SIMD registers, the conditions for which
> > have changed subtly from kernel release to kernel release. Usually the
> > pattern is to check for may_use_simd() and then fallback to using
> > something slower in the unlikely case SIMD registers aren't available.
> > So, this patch fixes up i915's accelerated memcpy routines to fallback
> > to boring memcpy if may_use_simd() is false.
> That would indicate that these functions are used from IRQ/softirq which
> break otherwise if the kernel is also using the registers. The crypto
> code uses it for that purpose.
> So
>    Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy at linutronix.de>
> May I ask how large the memcpy can be? I'm asking in case it is large
> and an explicit rescheduling point might be needed.

It is also quite likely that a 'rep movs' copy will be at least just as
fast on modern hardware.

Clearly if you are copying to/from PCIe memory you need the largest
resisters possible - but I think the graphics buffers are mapped cached?
(Otherwise I wouldn't see 3ms 'spins' while it invalidates the
entire screen buffer cache.)


Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list