[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v28 1/6] drm/i915: Introduce skl_plane_wm_level accessor.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 05:44:58PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> For future Gen12 SAGV implementation we need to
> seemlessly alter wm levels calculated, depending
> on whether we are allowed to enable SAGV or not.
> 
> So this accessor will give additional flexibility
> to do that.
> 
> Currently this accessor is still simply working
> as "pass-through" function. This will be changed
> in next coming patches from this series.
> 
> v2: - plane_id -> plane->id(Ville Syrjälä)
>     - Moved wm_level var to have more local scope
>       (Ville Syrjälä)
>     - Renamed yuv to color_plane(Ville Syrjälä) in
>       skl_plane_wm_level
> 
> v3: - plane->id -> plane_id(this time for real, Ville Syrjälä)
>     - Changed colorplane id type from boolean to int as index
>       (Ville Syrjälä)
>     - Moved crtc_state param so that it is first now
>       (Ville Syrjälä)
>     - Moved wm_level declaration to tigher scope in
>       skl_write_plane_wm(Ville Syrjälä)
> 
> v4: - Started to use enum values for color plane
>     - Do sizeof for a type what we are memset'ing
>     - Zero out wm_uv as well(Ville Syrjälä)
> 
> v5: - Fixed rebase conflict caused by COLOR_PLANE_*
>       enum removal
> 
> v6: - Do not use skl_plane_wm_level accessor in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 416cb1a1e7cb..8a86298962dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4632,6 +4632,18 @@ icl_get_total_relative_data_rate(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	return total_data_rate;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct skl_wm_level *
> +skl_plane_wm_level(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +		   enum plane_id plane_id,
> +		   int level,
> +		   int color_plane)
> +{
> +	const struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
> +		&crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
> +
> +	return color_plane == 0 ? &wm->wm[level] : &wm->uv_wm[level];

uv_wm still not a thing as far as the hw is concerned, so can't see why
we'd have this here.

> +}
> +
>  static int
>  skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
> @@ -5439,8 +5451,13 @@ void skl_write_plane_wm(struct intel_plane *plane,
>  		&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_uv[plane_id];
>  
>  	for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> +		const struct skl_wm_level *wm_level;
> +		int color_plane = 0;
> +
> +		wm_level = skl_plane_wm_level(crtc_state, plane_id, level, color_plane);
> +
>  		skl_write_wm_level(dev_priv, PLANE_WM(pipe, plane_id, level),
> -				   &wm->wm[level]);
> +				   wm_level);
>  	}
>  	skl_write_wm_level(dev_priv, PLANE_WM_TRANS(pipe, plane_id),
>  			   &wm->trans_wm);
> @@ -5473,8 +5490,13 @@ void skl_write_cursor_wm(struct intel_plane *plane,
>  		&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
>  
>  	for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> +		const struct skl_wm_level *wm_level;
> +		int color_plane = 0;
> +
> +		wm_level = skl_plane_wm_level(crtc_state, plane_id, level, color_plane);
> +
>  		skl_write_wm_level(dev_priv, CUR_WM(pipe, level),
> -				   &wm->wm[level]);
> +				   wm_level);
>  	}
>  	skl_write_wm_level(dev_priv, CUR_WM_TRANS(pipe), &wm->trans_wm);
>  
> -- 
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel