[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/gt: Kick virtual siblings on timeslice out
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon May 18 16:44:10 UTC 2020
If we decide to timeslice out the current virtual request, we will
unsubmit it while it is still busy (ve->context.inflight == sibling[0]).
If the virtual tasklet and then the other sibling tasklets run before we
completely schedule out the active virtual request for the preemption,
those other tasklets will see that the virtul request is still inflight
on sibling[0] and leave it be. Therefore when we finally schedule-out
the virtual request and if we see that we have passed it back to the
virtual engine, reschedule the virtual tasklet so that it may be
resubmitted on any of the siblings.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 80885ba87db5..05486e801a63 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ static void kick_siblings(struct i915_request *rq, struct intel_context *ce)
struct virtual_engine *ve = container_of(ce, typeof(*ve), context);
struct i915_request *next = READ_ONCE(ve->request);
- if (next && next->execution_mask & ~rq->execution_mask)
+ if (next == rq || (next && next->execution_mask & ~rq->execution_mask))
tasklet_hi_schedule(&ve->base.execlists.tasklet);
}
--
2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list