[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/22] drm/i915/gem: Suppress some random warnings

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed May 20 07:54:42 UTC 2020


Leave the error propagation in place, but limit the warnings to only
show up in CI if the unlikely errors are hit.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 3 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c       | 3 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c      | 3 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c    | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index e4fb6c372537..219a36995b96 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1626,8 +1626,7 @@ eb_relocate_entry(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
 			err = i915_vma_bind(target->vma,
 					    target->vma->obj->cache_level,
 					    PIN_GLOBAL, NULL);
-			if (drm_WARN_ONCE(&i915->drm, err,
-				      "Unexpected failure to bind target VMA!"))
+			if (err)
 				return err;
 		}
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
index 4c1c7232b024..12245a47e5fb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
@@ -27,8 +27,7 @@ static int i915_gem_object_get_pages_phys(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 	void *dst;
 	int i;
 
-	if (drm_WARN_ON(obj->base.dev,
-			i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle(obj)))
+	if (GEM_WARN_ON(i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle(obj)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c
index 5d5d7eef3f43..19dd21a95c47 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c
@@ -148,8 +148,7 @@ static int shmem_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 		last_pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
 
 		/* Check that the i965g/gm workaround works. */
-		drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
-			    (gfp & __GFP_DMA32) && (last_pfn >= 0x00100000UL));
+		GEM_BUG_ON(gfp & __GFP_DMA32 && last_pfn >= 0x00100000UL);
 	}
 	if (sg) { /* loop terminated early; short sg table */
 		sg_page_sizes |= sg->length;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
index 8b0708708671..ec9d25680b41 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	if (flags & I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED)
 		return capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ? 0 : -EPERM;
 
-	if (drm_WARN_ON(obj->base.dev, obj->userptr.mm == NULL))
+	if (GEM_WARN_ON(obj->userptr.mm == NULL))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mn = i915_mmu_notifier_find(obj->userptr.mm);
-- 
2.20.1



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list