[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15)

[Lisovskiy, Stanislav]

Thank you Lakshmi!

Best Regards,

Lisovskiy Stanislav

Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

________________________________________
From: Vudum, Lakshminarayana
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 11:43:26 AM
To: Lisovskiy, Stanislav; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Saarinen, Jani; Navare, Manasi D
Subject: RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15)

Filed a new bug and Re-reported.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisovskiy, Stanislav <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 9:22 AM
To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana <lakshminarayana.vudum at intel.com>; Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen at intel.com>; Navare, Manasi D <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15)

Self test failure as usual. And as usual not related to the patch.

Best Regards,

Lisovskiy Stanislav

________________________________________
From: Patchwork <patchwork at emeril.freedesktop.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 2:59 AM
To: Lisovskiy, Stanislav
Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15)

== Series Details ==

Series: Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74739/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8506 -> Patchwork_17718 ====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_17718 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.

  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_17718, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/index.html

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_17718:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt at i915_selftest@live at client:
    - fi-bsw-kefka:       [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8506/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live@client.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live@client.html


Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_17718 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt at i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
    - fi-glk-dsi:         [PASS][3] -> [TIMEOUT][4] ([i915#1288])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8506/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html

  * igt at i915_selftest@live at execlists:
    - fi-kbl-guc:         [PASS][5] -> [INCOMPLETE][6] ([i915#1874])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8506/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html

  * igt at kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
    - fi-kbl-7500u:       [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#227])
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8506/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html


#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt at i915_selftest@live at execlists:
    - fi-kbl-8809g:       [INCOMPLETE][9] ([i915#1874]) -> [PASS][10]
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8506/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html


  [i915#1288]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1288
  [i915#1874]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1874
  [i915#227]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/227


Participating hosts (49 -> 44)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): fi-kbl-7560u
  Missing    (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_8506 -> Patchwork_17718

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_8506: d6a73e9084ff6adfabbad014bc294d254484f304 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5661: a772a7c7a761c6125bc0af5284ad603478107737 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_17718: 2be3fecc6320f61ccbd0898132dcb7eedae7640b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

2be3fecc6320 drm/i915: Remove unneeded hack now for CDCLK b74b713c823f drm/i915: Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs
2405cfa20a90 drm/i915: Introduce for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask macro
4765b732c387 drm/i915: Plane configuration affects CDCLK in Gen11+
cc857a15d370 drm/i915: Check plane configuration properly
a2e2a5f43cd7 drm/i915: Extract cdclk requirements checking to separate function
42922a1cf4d9 drm/i915: Decouple cdclk calculation from modeset checks

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/index.html