[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/i915: Do not call drm_crtc_arm_vblank_event in async flips
Karthik B S
karthik.b.s at intel.com
Thu May 28 05:39:30 UTC 2020
Since the flip done event will be sent in the flip_done_handler,
no need to add the event to the list and delay it for later.
v2: -Moved the async check above vblank_get as it
was causing issues for PSR.
v3: -No need to wait for vblank to pass, as this wait was causing a
16ms delay once every few flips.
Signed-off-by: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
index 571c36f929bd..a67621887c42 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
u32 psr_status;
+ if (new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip)
+ goto irq_disable;
+
vblank_start = adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start;
if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
vblank_start = DIV_ROUND_UP(vblank_start, 2);
@@ -205,7 +208,7 @@ void intel_pipe_update_end(struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
* Would be slightly nice to just grab the vblank count and arm the
* event outside of the critical section - the spinlock might spin for a
* while ... */
- if (new_crtc_state->uapi.event) {
+ if (new_crtc_state->uapi.event && !new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip) {
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
drm_crtc_vblank_get(&crtc->base) != 0);
@@ -219,6 +222,9 @@ void intel_pipe_update_end(struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
local_irq_enable();
+ if (new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip)
+ return;
+
if (intel_vgpu_active(dev_priv))
return;
--
2.17.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list