[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_ddb_weight()
Lisovskiy, Stanislav
stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com
Wed Nov 4 15:35:14 UTC 2020
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:39:48PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits() doesn't care how the weights
> for distributing the ddb are caclculated for each pipe. Put that
> calculation into a separate function so that such mundane details
> are hidden from view.
>
> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 0ef01a01ef8d..d14cdedc4ac3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4084,6 +4084,25 @@ u32 skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return slice_mask;
> }
>
> +static unsigned int intel_crtc_ddb_weight(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> + &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> + int hdisplay, vdisplay;
> +
> + if (!crtc_state->hw.active)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Watermark/ddb requirement highly depends upon width of the
> + * framebuffer, So instead of allocating DDB equally among pipes
> + * distribute DDB based on resolution/width of the display.
> + */
> + drm_mode_get_hv_timing(adjusted_mode, &hdisplay, &vdisplay);
> +
> + return hdisplay;
> +}
> +
> static u8 skl_compute_dbuf_slices(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> u8 active_pipes);
>
> @@ -4098,7 +4117,7 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
> struct drm_crtc *for_crtc = crtc_state->uapi.crtc;
> const struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> - u32 pipe_width = 0, total_width_in_range = 0, width_before_pipe_in_range = 0;
> + unsigned int pipe_weight = 0, total_weight = 0, weight_before_pipe = 0;
> enum pipe for_pipe = to_intel_crtc(for_crtc)->pipe;
> struct intel_dbuf_state *new_dbuf_state =
> intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(intel_state);
> @@ -4167,18 +4186,11 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> */
> ddb_range_size = hweight8(dbuf_slice_mask) * slice_size;
>
> - /*
> - * Watermark/ddb requirement highly depends upon width of the
> - * framebuffer, So instead of allocating DDB equally among pipes
> - * distribute DDB based on resolution/width of the display.
> - */
> total_slice_mask = dbuf_slice_mask;
> for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(intel_state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> - const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> - &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> - int hdisplay, vdisplay;
> - u32 pipe_dbuf_slice_mask;
> + unsigned int weight;
> + u8 pipe_dbuf_slice_mask;
>
> if (!crtc_state->hw.active)
> continue;
> @@ -4205,14 +4217,13 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> if (dbuf_slice_mask != pipe_dbuf_slice_mask)
> continue;
>
> - drm_mode_get_hv_timing(adjusted_mode, &hdisplay, &vdisplay);
> -
> - total_width_in_range += hdisplay;
> + weight = intel_crtc_ddb_weight(crtc_state);
> + total_weight += weight;
>
> if (pipe < for_pipe)
> - width_before_pipe_in_range += hdisplay;
> + weight_before_pipe += weight;
> else if (pipe == for_pipe)
> - pipe_width = hdisplay;
> + pipe_weight = weight;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -4227,9 +4238,8 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - start = ddb_range_size * width_before_pipe_in_range / total_width_in_range;
> - end = ddb_range_size *
> - (width_before_pipe_in_range + pipe_width) / total_width_in_range;
> + start = ddb_range_size * weight_before_pipe / total_weight;
> + end = ddb_range_size * (weight_before_pipe + pipe_weight) / total_weight;
>
> alloc->start = offset + start;
> alloc->end = offset + end;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list