[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Fix wrong return value of perf_request_latency()
Patchwork
patchwork at emeril.freedesktop.org
Mon Nov 16 16:29:07 UTC 2020
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/selftests: Fix wrong return value of perf_request_latency()
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/83891/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9337 -> Patchwork_18915
====================================================
Summary
-------
**WARNING**
Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_18915 need to be verified
manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_18915, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_18915:
### IGT changes ###
#### Warnings ####
* igt at i915_selftest@live at gt_pm:
- fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-FAIL][1] ([i915#1759]) -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9337/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html
New tests
---------
New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_9337 and Patchwork_18915:
### New CI tests (1) ###
* boot:
- Statuses : 41 pass(s)
- Exec time: [0.0] s
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_18915 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt at i915_module_load@reload:
- fi-byt-j1900: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#1982])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9337/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
* igt at kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
- fi-bsw-kefka: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#1982])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9337/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic.html
* igt at kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-legacy:
- fi-icl-u2: [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-WARN][8] ([i915#1982])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9337/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-legacy.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-legacy.html
* igt at kms_force_connector_basic@force-connector-state:
- fi-icl-u2: [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-WARN][10] ([i915#1226])
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9337/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-connector-state.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-connector-state.html
* igt at prime_self_import@basic-with_two_bos:
- fi-tgl-y: [PASS][11] -> [DMESG-WARN][12] ([i915#402]) +1 similar issue
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9337/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_two_bos.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_two_bos.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt at gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0:
- fi-glk-dsi: [DMESG-WARN][13] ([i915#1982]) -> [PASS][14]
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9337/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html
* igt at i915_module_load@reload:
- fi-icl-u2: [DMESG-WARN][15] ([i915#1982]) -> [PASS][16] +1 similar issue
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9337/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
- fi-tgl-u2: [DMESG-WARN][17] ([i915#1982] / [k.org#205379]) -> [PASS][18]
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9337/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
* igt at kms_busy@basic at flip:
- {fi-kbl-7560u}: [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#1982]) -> [PASS][20]
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9337/fi-kbl-7560u/igt@kms_busy@basic@flip.html
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/fi-kbl-7560u/igt@kms_busy@basic@flip.html
* igt at prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip:
- fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-WARN][21] ([i915#402]) -> [PASS][22] +1 similar issue
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9337/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip.html
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[i915#1226]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1226
[i915#1759]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1759
[i915#1982]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1982
[i915#2411]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2411
[i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402
[k.org#205379]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205379
Participating hosts (46 -> 41)
------------------------------
Missing (5): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_9337 -> Patchwork_18915
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_9337: 85c17640f343b06686aa677896856f2dc1388c21 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5853: cbe997b92e4b96f8c29b5e2d49fb2ed88e1de3e2 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_18915: 007ddcdd7ed61444cec6d950d98d3ebd63835e0b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
007ddcdd7ed6 drm/i915/selftests: Fix wrong return value of perf_request_latency()
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18915/index.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20201116/ec5559e3/attachment.htm>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list