[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Properly flag modesets for all bigjoiner pipes

[Navare, Manasi]

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:01:35PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> 
> If either of the bigjoiner pipes needs a modeset then we need
> a modeset on both pipes. Make it so.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 40 ++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 595183f7b60f..321321230a55 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -15355,21 +15355,16 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_bigjoiner(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> -static int kill_bigjoiner_slave(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -				struct intel_crtc_state *master_crtc_state)
> +static void kill_bigjoiner_slave(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +				 struct intel_crtc_state *master_crtc_state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *slave_crtc_state =
> -		intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(&state->base,
> -					    master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc);
> -
> -	if (IS_ERR(slave_crtc_state))
> -		return PTR_ERR(slave_crtc_state);
> +		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc);

Isnt this just a cleanup, doesnt relate to adding linked bigjoiner
pipe to the modeset.
Split this in a separate patch? Or atleast mention this in the commit message

Other than that looks good to me

Manasi


>  
>  	slave_crtc_state->bigjoiner = master_crtc_state->bigjoiner = false;
>  	slave_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave = master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave = false;
>  	slave_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc = master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc = NULL;
>  	intel_crtc_copy_uapi_to_hw_state(state, slave_crtc_state);
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -15507,7 +15502,7 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_async(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  
>  static int intel_bigjoiner_add_affected_crtcs(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  {
> -	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> +	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  	int i;
>  
> @@ -15521,6 +15516,16 @@ static int intel_bigjoiner_add_affected_crtcs(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  								crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc);
>  		if (IS_ERR(linked_crtc_state))
>  			return PTR_ERR(linked_crtc_state);
> +
> +		if (needs_modeset(crtc_state))
> +			linked_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> +		/* Kill old bigjoiner link, we may re-establish afterwards */
> +		if (needs_modeset(crtc_state) &&
> +		    crtc_state->bigjoiner && !crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> +			kill_bigjoiner_slave(state, crtc_state);
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -15564,13 +15569,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		/* Kill old bigjoiner link, we may re-establish afterwards */
> -		if (old_crtc_state->bigjoiner && !old_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) {
> -			ret = kill_bigjoiner_slave(state, new_crtc_state);
> -			if (ret)
> -				goto fail;
> -		}
> -
>  		if (!new_crtc_state->uapi.enable) {
>  			if (!new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) {
>  				intel_crtc_copy_uapi_to_hw_state(state, new_crtc_state);
> @@ -15640,6 +15638,16 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>  				new_crtc_state->update_pipe = false;
>  			}
>  		}
> +
> +		if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner) {
> +			struct intel_crtc_state *linked_crtc_state =
> +				intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc);
> +
> +			if (needs_modeset(linked_crtc_state)) {
> +				new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true;
> +				new_crtc_state->update_pipe = false;
> +			}
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx