[Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -54.0% regression
Xing Zhengjun
zhengjun.xing at linux.intel.com
Thu Nov 26 01:44:55 UTC 2020
On 11/25/2020 4:47 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Oliver Sang (2020-11-19 07:20:18)
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:27:13PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Could you add intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org into reports going
>>> forward.
>>>
>>> Quoting kernel test robot (2020-11-11 17:58:11)
>>>>
>>>> Greeting,
>>>>
>>>> FYI, we noticed a -54.0% regression of phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second due to commit:
>>>
>>> How many runs are there on the bad version to ensure the bisect is
>>> repeatable?
>>
>> test 4 times.
>> zxing at inn:/result/phoronix-test-suite/performance-true-Radial_Gradient_Paint-1024x1024-jxrendermark-1.2.4-ucode=0xd6-monitor=da39a3ee/lkp-cfl-d1/debian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc8544fc3da$ grep -r "operations_per_second" */stats.json
>> 0/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4133.487932,
>> 1/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4120.421503,
>> 2/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4188.414835,
>> 3/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4068.549514,
>
> a w/o revert (drm-tip)
> b w/ revert
> +mB----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | ..b |
> | ..b.aa |
> | ....a.a |
> | ....a.a |
> | b b ........a |
> | b b b b......... a |
> | b bb bbb........... |
> |b ab bbab.bb.b............ba b a a ab a|
> | |__A__| |
> | |MA_| |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
> a 120 3621.8761 7356.4442 4606.7895 4607.9132 156.17693
> b 120 2664.0563 6359.9686 4519.5036 4534.4463 95.471121
>
> The patch is not expected to have any impact on the machine you are testing on.
> -Chris
>
What's your code base?
For my side:
1) sync the code to the head of Linux mainline
2) git reset --hard 59dd13ad31
3) git revert 59dd13ad3107
We compare the test result of commit 59dd13ad3107 (step 2) and
2052847b06f8 (step 3, revert 59dd13ad3107), the regression should
related with 59dd13ad3107. Each test case we run 5 times.
=========================================================================================
tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/need_x/test/option_a/option_b/cpufreq_governor/ucode/debug-setup:
lkp-cfl-d1/phoronix-test-suite/debian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/true/jxrendermark-1.2.4/Radial
Gradient Paint/1024x1024/performance/0xde/regression_test
commit:
0dccdba51e852271a3dbc9358375f4c882b863f2
59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc8544fc3da
2052847b06f863a028f7f3bbc62401e043b34301 (revert 59dd13ad3107)
0dccdba51e852271 59dd13ad310793757e34afa489d 2052847b06f863a028f7f3bbc62
---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
\ | \ | \
8145 ± 2% -53.1% 3817 ± 3% -1.8% 7995
phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second
--
Zhengjun Xing
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list