[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/20] drm/i915: Introduce AUX_CH_USBCn

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Oct 8 08:40:28 UTC 2020


On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:51:11PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:33:34PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> >Just like with the DDIs tgl+ renamed the AUX CHs to reflect
> >the type of the DDI. Let's add the aliasing enum values for
> >the type-C AUX CHs.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h |  8 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c      | 53 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >index a39be3c9e0cf..cba876721ea0 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >@@ -290,6 +290,14 @@ enum aux_ch {
> > 	AUX_CH_G,
> > 	AUX_CH_H,
> > 	AUX_CH_I,
> >+
> >+	/* tgl+ */
> >+	AUX_CH_USBC1 = AUX_CH_D,
> >+	AUX_CH_USBC2,
> >+	AUX_CH_USBC3,
> >+	AUX_CH_USBC4,
> >+	AUX_CH_USBC5,
> >+	AUX_CH_USBC6,
> > };
> >
> > #define aux_ch_name(a) ((a) + 'A')
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >index 239016dcd544..a73c354c920e 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >@@ -1792,7 +1792,6 @@ static i915_reg_t skl_aux_ctl_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > 	case AUX_CH_D:
> > 	case AUX_CH_E:
> > 	case AUX_CH_F:
> >-	case AUX_CH_G:
> > 		return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch);
> > 	default:
> > 		MISSING_CASE(aux_ch);
> >@@ -1813,7 +1812,52 @@ static i915_reg_t skl_aux_data_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int index)
> > 	case AUX_CH_D:
> > 	case AUX_CH_E:
> > 	case AUX_CH_F:
> >-	case AUX_CH_G:
> >+		return DP_AUX_CH_DATA(aux_ch, index);
> >+	default:
> >+		MISSING_CASE(aux_ch);
> >+		return DP_AUX_CH_DATA(AUX_CH_A, index);
> >+	}
> >+}
> >+
> >+static i915_reg_t tgl_aux_ctl_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >+{
> >+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> >+	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> >+	enum aux_ch aux_ch = dig_port->aux_ch;
> >+
> >+	switch (aux_ch) {
> >+	case AUX_CH_A:
> >+	case AUX_CH_B:
> >+	case AUX_CH_C:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC1:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC2:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC3:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC4:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC5:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC6:
> >+		return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch);
> >+	default:
> >+		MISSING_CASE(aux_ch);
> >+		return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(AUX_CH_A);
> >+	}
> >+}
> >+
> >+static i915_reg_t tgl_aux_data_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int index)
> >+{
> >+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> >+	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> >+	enum aux_ch aux_ch = dig_port->aux_ch;
> >+
> >+	switch (aux_ch) {
> >+	case AUX_CH_A:
> >+	case AUX_CH_B:
> >+	case AUX_CH_C:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC1:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC2:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC3:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC4:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC5:
> >+	case AUX_CH_USBC6:
> > 		return DP_AUX_CH_DATA(aux_ch, index);
> > 	default:
> > 		MISSING_CASE(aux_ch);
> >@@ -1834,7 +1878,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > 	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > 	struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dig_port->base;
> >
> >-	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) {
> >+	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> >+		intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg = tgl_aux_ctl_reg;
> 
> why is this even a function pointer rather than just the reg? AFAICS it
> only depends on dig_port->aux_ch that is initialized in intel_ddi_init()

Just for consistency with .aux_ch_data_reg() I guess. Can't remember
a more specific reason at least.

> 
> but could be orthogonal to the change here.
> 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> 
> Lucas De Marchi
> 
> >+		intel_dp->aux_ch_data_reg = tgl_aux_data_reg;
> >+	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) {
> > 		intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg = skl_aux_ctl_reg;
> > 		intel_dp->aux_ch_data_reg = skl_aux_data_reg;
> > 	} else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) {
> >-- 
> >2.26.2
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Intel-gfx mailing list
> >Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> >https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list