[Intel-gfx] [CI 3/4] drm/i915: Enable eLLC caching of display buffers for SKL+

[Chris Wilson]

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Since SKL the eLLC has been sitting on the far side of the system
agent, meaning the display engine can utilize it. Let's enable that.

I chose WB for the caching mode, because my numbers are indicating
that WT might actually be WB and WC might actually be UC. I'm not
100% sure that is indeed the case but at least my simple rendercopy
based benchmark didn't see any difference in performance.

Also if I configure things to do LLCeLLC+WT I still get cache dirt
on my screen, suggesting that is in fact operating in WB mode
anyway. This is also the reason I had to fix the MOCS target cache
to really say PTE rather than LLC+eLLC.
Since SKL the eLLC has been sitting on the far side of the system agent,
meaning the display engine can utilize it. Let's enable that.

Eero's earlier benchmarks numbers:
"* Results in GfxBench and Unigine (Valley/Heaven) tests were within daily
   variation on the tested SKL machines

 * SKL GT4e (128MB eLLC) / Wayland / Weston:
   +15-20% SynMark TexMem512 (512MB of textures)
   +4-6% SynMark TerrainFly*, CSCloth, ShMapVsm
   -5-10% SynMark TexMem128 (128MB of textures)

 * SKL GT3e (64MB eLLC) / Xorg / Unity:
   +4-8% GpuTest Triangle fullscreen (FullHD)
   -5-10% GpuTest Triangle windowed (1/2 screen)

 * SKL GT2 (no eLLC) / Xorg / Unity:
   * Some of the higher FPS SynMark pixel and vertex shader tests
     are few percent higher, more than daily variance
   => Do you see any reason why this machine would be impacted
      although it doesn't eLLC?"

Caveats:
- Still haven't tested with a prime setup
- Still not entirely sure this a good idea, but I've been
  using it on my cfl anyway :)

v2: Split the MOCS PTE change out

Cc: Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007120329.17076-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c | 10 ++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h     |  3 +--
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
index 3f1114b58b01..7bfe9072be9a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void cnl_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 			   GEN8_PPAT_WC | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
 	intel_uncore_write(uncore,
 			   GEN10_PAT_INDEX(2),
-			   GEN8_PPAT_WT | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
+			   GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_ELLC_OVERRIDE);
 	intel_uncore_write(uncore,
 			   GEN10_PAT_INDEX(3),
 			   GEN8_PPAT_UC);
@@ -349,17 +349,23 @@ static void cnl_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
  */
 static void bdw_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 {
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = uncore->i915;
 	u64 pat;
 
 	pat = GEN8_PPAT(0, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLC) |	/* for normal objects, no eLLC */
 	      GEN8_PPAT(1, GEN8_PPAT_WC | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC) |	/* for something pointing to ptes? */
-	      GEN8_PPAT(2, GEN8_PPAT_WT | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC) |	/* for scanout with eLLC */
 	      GEN8_PPAT(3, GEN8_PPAT_UC) |			/* Uncached objects, mostly for scanout */
 	      GEN8_PPAT(4, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(0)) |
 	      GEN8_PPAT(5, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(1)) |
 	      GEN8_PPAT(6, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(2)) |
 	      GEN8_PPAT(7, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(3));
 
+	/* for scanout with eLLC */
+	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 9)
+		pat |= GEN8_PPAT(2, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_ELLC_OVERRIDE);
+	else
+		pat |= GEN8_PPAT(2, GEN8_PPAT_WT | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
+
 	intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_LO, lower_32_bits(pat));
 	intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_HI, upper_32_bits(pat));
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index c95db2d5485c..1a5729932c81 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1639,8 +1639,7 @@ tgl_revids_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 #define HAS_SNOOP(dev_priv)	(INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_snoop)
 #define HAS_EDRAM(dev_priv)	((dev_priv)->edram_size_mb)
 #define HAS_SECURE_BATCHES(dev_priv) (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 6)
-#define HAS_WT(dev_priv)	((IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || \
-				 IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) && HAS_EDRAM(dev_priv))
+#define HAS_WT(dev_priv)	HAS_EDRAM(dev_priv)
 
 #define HWS_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(dev_priv)	(INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->hws_needs_physical)
 
-- 
2.20.1