[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 01/10] i915/gem_userptr_blits: Tighten has_userptr()

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 14/10/2020 11:40, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We use has_userptr() to determine if the different flags are supported,
> so it helps not to override the flags inside the test.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c | 12 ++++++------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c b/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
> index 268423dcd..01498edad 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
> @@ -71,8 +71,7 @@
>   #define PAGE_SIZE 4096
>   #endif
>   
> -static uint32_t userptr_flags = I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED;
> -
> +static uint32_t userptr_flags;
>   static bool *can_mmap;
>   
>   #define WIDTH 512
> @@ -504,14 +503,11 @@ static int has_userptr(int fd)
>   {
>   	uint32_t handle = 0;
>   	void *ptr;
> -	uint32_t oldflags;
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	igt_assert(posix_memalign(&ptr, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE) == 0);
> -	oldflags = userptr_flags;
> -	gem_userptr_test_unsynchronized();
>   	ret = __gem_userptr(fd, ptr, PAGE_SIZE, 0, userptr_flags, &handle);
> -	userptr_flags = oldflags;
> +	errno = 0;
>   	if (ret != 0) {
>   		free(ptr);
>   		return 0;
> @@ -2112,6 +2108,10 @@ igt_main_args("c:", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>   
>   	igt_subtest_group {
>   		igt_fixture {
> +			/* Either mode will do for parameter checking */
> +			gem_userptr_test_synchronized();
> +			if (!has_userptr(fd))
> +				gem_userptr_test_unsynchronized();
>   			igt_require(has_userptr(fd));
>   		}
>   
> 

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko