[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 07/11] drm/i915: Make hardware readout work on i915.
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon Oct 19 16:36:59 UTC 2020
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 02:45:31PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>
> Unfortunately I have no way to test this, but it should be correct
> if the bios sets up bigjoiner in a sane way.
>
> Skip iterating over bigjoiner slaves, only the master has the state we
> care about.
>
> Add the width of the bigjoiner slave to the reconstructed fb.
>
> Hide the bigjoiner slave to userspace, and double the mode on bigjoiner
> master.
>
> And last, disable bigjoiner slave from primary if reconstruction fails.
>
> v2:
> * Manual Rebase (Manasi)
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index faf8bf757bed..aa981aa4f6a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -3619,6 +3619,8 @@ intel_find_initial_plane_obj(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> struct intel_plane *intel_plane = to_intel_plane(primary);
> struct intel_plane_state *intel_state =
> to_intel_plane_state(plane_state);
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
Whitespace fail. Didn't checkpatch complain?
> + to_intel_crtc_state(intel_crtc->base.state);
> struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
> struct i915_vma *vma;
>
> @@ -3641,7 +3643,7 @@ intel_find_initial_plane_obj(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> if (c == &intel_crtc->base)
> continue;
>
> - if (!to_intel_crtc(c)->active)
> + if (!to_intel_crtc_state(c->state)->uapi.active)
> continue;
>
> state = to_intel_plane_state(c->primary->state);
> @@ -3663,6 +3665,11 @@ intel_find_initial_plane_obj(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> * pretend the BIOS never had it enabled.
> */
> intel_plane_disable_noatomic(intel_crtc, intel_plane);
> + if (crtc_state->bigjoiner) {
> + struct intel_crtc *slave =
> + crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
> + intel_plane_disable_noatomic(slave, to_intel_plane(slave->base.primary));
> + }
>
> return;
>
> @@ -10687,6 +10694,7 @@ static void
> skl_get_initial_plane_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct intel_initial_plane_config *plane_config)
> {
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(crtc->base.primary);
> @@ -10795,6 +10803,18 @@ skl_get_initial_plane_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> fb->height = ((val >> 16) & 0xffff) + 1;
> fb->width = ((val >> 0) & 0xffff) + 1;
>
> + /* add bigjoiner slave as well, if the fb stretches both */
> + if (crtc_state->bigjoiner) {
> + enum pipe bigjoiner_pipe = crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc->pipe;
> +
> + if (fb->width == crtc_state->pipe_src_w &&
> + (intel_de_read(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id)) & 0xfffff000) == plane_config->base) {
> + val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PLANE_SIZE(bigjoiner_pipe, plane_id));
> + fb->height += ((val >> 16) & 0xfff) + 1;
> + fb->width += ((val >> 0) & 0x1fff) + 1;
This looks wrong.
> + }
> + }
> +
> val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PLANE_STRIDE(pipe, plane_id));
> stride_mult = skl_plane_stride_mult(fb, 0, DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0);
> fb->pitches[0] = (val & 0x3ff) * stride_mult;
> @@ -18793,7 +18813,8 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>
> /* Adjust the state of the output pipe according to whether we
> * have active connectors/encoders. */
> - if (crtc_state->hw.active && !intel_crtc_has_encoders(crtc))
> + if (crtc_state->hw.active && !intel_crtc_has_encoders(crtc) &&
> + !crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(crtc, ctx);
>
> if (crtc_state->hw.active || HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
> @@ -19072,6 +19093,9 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> struct intel_plane *plane;
> int min_cdclk = 0;
>
> + if (crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> + continue;
> +
> if (crtc_state->hw.active) {
> struct drm_display_mode mode;
>
> @@ -19096,6 +19120,9 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> mode.hdisplay = crtc_state->pipe_src_w;
> mode.vdisplay = crtc_state->pipe_src_h;
>
> + if (crtc_state->bigjoiner)
> + mode.hdisplay *= 2;
> +
> intel_crtc_compute_pixel_rate(crtc_state);
>
> intel_crtc_update_active_timings(crtc_state);
> @@ -19146,6 +19173,39 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> intel_bw_crtc_update(bw_state, crtc_state);
>
> intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, crtc_state);
> +
> + /* discard our incomplete slave state, copy it from master */
Wasn't expecting this many horrible hacks around readout. So basiclly it
looks like we have very little in terms of useful readout+state
checking.
> + if (crtc_state->bigjoiner && crtc_state->hw.active) {
> + struct intel_crtc *slave = crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
> + struct intel_crtc_state *slave_crtc_state =
> + to_intel_crtc_state(slave->base.state);
> +
> + copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state(slave_crtc_state, crtc_state);
> + slave->base.mode = crtc->base.mode;
> +
> + cdclk_state->min_cdclk[slave->pipe] = min_cdclk;
> + cdclk_state->min_voltage_level[slave->pipe] =
> + crtc_state->min_voltage_level;
> +
> + for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(&dev_priv->drm, slave, plane) {
> + const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state =
> + to_intel_plane_state(plane->base.state);
> +
> + /*
> + * FIXME don't have the fb yet, so can't
> + * use intel_plane_data_rate() :(
> + */
> + if (plane_state->uapi.visible)
> + crtc_state->data_rate[plane->id] =
> + 4 * crtc_state->pixel_rate;
> + else
> + crtc_state->data_rate[plane->id] = 0;
> + }
> +
> + intel_bw_crtc_update(bw_state, slave_crtc_state);
> + drm_calc_timestamping_constants(&slave->base,
> + &slave_crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode);
> + }
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.19.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list