[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 4/7] drm/i915: Do not call drm_crtc_arm_vblank_event in async flips
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Sep 1 11:23:46 UTC 2020
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 03:05:48PM +0530, Karthik B S wrote:
> Since the flip done event will be sent in the flip_done_handler,
> no need to add the event to the list and delay it for later.
>
> v2: -Moved the async check above vblank_get as it
> was causing issues for PSR.
>
> v3: -No need to wait for vblank to pass, as this wait was causing a
> 16ms delay once every few flips.
>
> v4: -Rebased.
>
> v5: -Rebased.
>
> v6: -Rebased.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> index c26ca029fc0a..2b2d96c59d7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> u32 psr_status;
>
> + if (new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip)
> + goto irq_disable;
We shouldn't really need the irq disable at all if we don't do the
vblank evade. And if we only write ctl+surf then atomicity is already
guaranteed by the hw.
> +
> vblank_start = adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start;
> if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
> vblank_start = DIV_ROUND_UP(vblank_start, 2);
> @@ -206,7 +209,7 @@ void intel_pipe_update_end(struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> * Would be slightly nice to just grab the vblank count and arm the
> * event outside of the critical section - the spinlock might spin for a
> * while ... */
> - if (new_crtc_state->uapi.event) {
> + if (new_crtc_state->uapi.event && !new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip) {
> drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
> drm_crtc_vblank_get(&crtc->base) != 0);
>
> @@ -220,6 +223,9 @@ void intel_pipe_update_end(struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
>
> local_irq_enable();
>
> + if (new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip)
> + return;
> +
> if (intel_vgpu_active(dev_priv))
> return;
>
> --
> 2.22.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list