[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 6/8] drm/i915: WA for platforms with double buffered adress update enable bit
Karthik B S
karthik.b.s at intel.com
Wed Sep 16 12:54:32 UTC 2020
On 9/15/2020 7:49 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:26:31AM +0530, Karthik B S wrote:
>> In Gen 9 and Gen 10 platforms, async address update enable bit is
>> double buffered. Due to this, during the transition from async flip
>> to sync flip we have to wait until this bit is updated before continuing
>> with the normal commit for sync flip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index a0c17d94daf3..b7e24dff0772 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -15360,6 +15360,42 @@ static void intel_enable_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>> intel_crtc_enable_pipe_crc(crtc);
>> }
>>
>> +static void skl_toggle_async_sync(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> skl_disable_async_flip_wa() maybe?
>
Thanks for the review.
I'll change the name.
>> + struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> + struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>> + struct intel_plane *plane;
>> + struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state;
>> + u32 update_mask = new_crtc_state->update_planes;
>> + u32 plane_ctl, surf_addr;
>> + enum plane_id plane_id;
>> + unsigned long irqflags;
>> + enum pipe pipe;
>
> Most of these things are only needed within the loop, so that's where
> the declarations should be.
>
Sure, I'll move it inside the loop.
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for_each_new_intel_plane_in_state(state, plane, new_plane_state, i) {
>> + if (crtc->pipe != plane->pipe ||
>> + !(update_mask & BIT(plane->id)))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + plane_id = plane->id;
>> + pipe = plane->pipe;
>> +
>
> I'd take the lock here so the rmw is fully protected.
>
Sure, I'll move it here.
>> + plane_ctl = intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CTL(pipe, plane_id));
>> + surf_addr = intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id));
>> +
>> + plane_ctl &= ~PLANE_CTL_ASYNC_FLIP;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>> + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CTL(pipe, plane_id), plane_ctl);
>> + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), surf_addr);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>> + }
>> +
>> + intel_wait_for_vblank(dev_priv, crtc->pipe);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void intel_update_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>> struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> {
>> @@ -15387,6 +15423,14 @@ static void intel_update_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>> else
>> intel_fbc_enable(state, crtc);
>>
>> + /* WA for older platforms where async address update enable bit
>
> s/older//
>
Noted.
>> + * is double buffered.
>
> "is double buffered and only latched at start of vblank" or
> something. Otherwise one is left wondering what the fuss is about.
>
Sure, I'll update this.
>> + */
>
> Multiline comment format should be
> /*
> * blah
> * blah
> */
>
I'll fix this.
>> + if (old_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip &&
>> + !new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip &&
>> + INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 10 && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
>
> IS_GEN_RANGE(9, 10) or whatever it's called.
>
Sure, I'll update this.
> I guess we might want to put this call into intel_pre_plane_update()
> since that's where all kinds of similar wait_for_vblank w/as live.
>
Sure, I'll move this to intel_pre_plane_update()
Thanks,
Karthik.B.S
>> + skl_toggle_async_sync(state, crtc, new_crtc_state);
>> +
>> /* Perform vblank evasion around commit operation */
>> intel_pipe_update_start(new_crtc_state);
>>
>> --
>> 2.22.0
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list