[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display/ehl: Limit eDP to HBR2
Souza, Jose
jose.souza at intel.com
Wed Sep 30 20:21:03 UTC 2020
On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 15:56 +0000, Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <
> intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org
> > On Behalf Of José Roberto de Souza
> Sent: 29 September 2020 01:33
> To:
> intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display/ehl: Limit eDP to HBR2
>
> Recent update in documentation defeatured eDP HBR3 for EHL and JSL.
>
> v2:
> - Remove dead code in ehl_get_combo_buf_trans()
>
> BSpec: 32247
> Cc: Matt Roper <
> matthew.d.roper at intel.com
> >
> Cc: Vidya Srinivas <
> vidya.srinivas at intel.com
> >
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <
> jose.souza at intel.com
> >
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 9 ++------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index 4d06178cd76c..ef06b7b82be9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -1082,13 +1082,8 @@ ehl_get_combo_buf_trans(struct intel_encoder *encoder, int type, int rate,
> return icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_hdmi;
> case INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP:
> if (dev_priv->vbt.edp.low_vswing) {
> -if (rate > 540000) {
> -*n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr3);
> -return icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr3;
> -} else {
> -*n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr2);
> -return icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr2;
> -}
> +*n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr2);
> +return icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr2;
>
> As pe Bspec, ehl_edp_hbr2 does not match with icl_edp_hbr2 values. Rather I see (icl_edp_hbr2 == ehl_edp_hbr) true.
This change is not related to voltage swing tables, it is only removing a dead code as the hbr3 voltage swing table will never be used in EHL/JSL.
Yeah the voltage swing tables for EHL are not matching too, could you update it in your series updating the JSL tables?
>
> Thanks,
> Tejas
> }
> /* fall through */
> default:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 54a4b81ea3ff..96d2c76772d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -277,13 +277,20 @@ static int icl_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, dig_port->base.port);
>
> if (intel_phy_is_combo(dev_priv, phy) &&
> - !IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv) &&
> !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> return 540000;
>
> return 810000;
> }
>
> +static int ehl_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) {
> +if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> +return 540000;
> +
> +return 810000;
> +}
> +
> static void
> intel_dp_set_source_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { @@ -318,6 +325,8 @@ intel_dp_set_source_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> size = ARRAY_SIZE(cnl_rates);
> if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 10))
> max_rate = cnl_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
> +else if (IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv))
> +max_rate = ehl_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
> else
> max_rate = icl_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
> } else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> --
> 2.28.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list