[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Rewrite CL/CTG L-shaped memory detection
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Apr 22 13:11:22 UTC 2021
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:49:43AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:34:01PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Currently we try to detect a symmetric memory configurations
> > using a magic DCC2_MODIFIED_ENHANCED_DISABLE bit. That bit is
> > either only set on a very specific subset of machines or it
> > just does not exist (it's not mentioned in any public chipset
> > datasheets I've found). As it happens my CL/CTG machines never
> > set said bit, even if I populate the channels with identical
> > sticks.
> >
> > So let's do the L-shaped memory detection the same way as the
> > desktop variants, ie. just look at the DRAM rank boundary
> > registers to see if both channels have an identical size.
> >
> > With this my CL/CTG no longer claim L-shaped memory when I use
> > identical sticks. Also tested with non-matching sticks just to
> > make sure the L-shaped memory is still properly detected.
> >
> > And for completeness let's update the debugfs code to dump
> > the correct set of registers on each platform.
> >
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> Did you check this with the swapping igt? I have some vague memories of
> bug reports where somehow the machine was acting like it's L-shaped memory
> despite that banks were populated equally. I've iirc tried all kinds of
> tricks to figure it out, all to absolutely no avail.
Did you have a specific test in mind? I ran a bunch of things
that seemed swizzle related. All passed just fine.
Chris did have similar concerns and suggested we should have
better tests. I guess what I should try to do is some selftests
which make sure we test both high and low physical addresses
and check the swizzle pattern is as expected. But haven't
found the time to do that yet.
>
> tbh I'd just not touch this, not really worth it.
It's totally worth it to get gen4 machines working again.
> -Daniel
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++++
> > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c
> > index 0fa6c38893f7..754f20768de5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c
> > @@ -693,14 +693,15 @@ static void detect_bit_6_swizzle(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
> > swizzle_x = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10_17;
> > swizzle_y = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_17;
> > }
> > - break;
> > - }
> >
> > - /* check for L-shaped memory aka modified enhanced addressing */
> > - if (IS_GEN(i915, 4) &&
> > - !(intel_uncore_read(uncore, DCC2) & DCC2_MODIFIED_ENHANCED_DISABLE)) {
> > - swizzle_x = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_UNKNOWN;
> > - swizzle_y = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_UNKNOWN;
> > + /* check for L-shaped memory aka modified enhanced addressing */
> > + if (IS_GEN(i915, 4) &&
> > + intel_uncore_read16(uncore, C0DRB3_CL) !=
> > + intel_uncore_read16(uncore, C1DRB3_CL)) {
> > + swizzle_x = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_UNKNOWN;
> > + swizzle_y = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_UNKNOWN;
> > + }
> > + break;
> > }
> >
> > if (dcc == 0xffffffff) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > index 8dd374691102..6de11ffcde38 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > @@ -621,10 +621,18 @@ static int i915_swizzle_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > intel_uncore_read(uncore, DCC));
> > seq_printf(m, "DDC2 = 0x%08x\n",
> > intel_uncore_read(uncore, DCC2));
> > - seq_printf(m, "C0DRB3 = 0x%04x\n",
> > - intel_uncore_read16(uncore, C0DRB3_BW));
> > - seq_printf(m, "C1DRB3 = 0x%04x\n",
> > - intel_uncore_read16(uncore, C1DRB3_BW));
> > +
> > + if (IS_G45(dev_priv) || IS_I965G(dev_priv) || IS_G33(dev_priv)) {
> > + seq_printf(m, "C0DRB3 = 0x%04x\n",
> > + intel_uncore_read16(uncore, C0DRB3_BW));
> > + seq_printf(m, "C1DRB3 = 0x%04x\n",
> > + intel_uncore_read16(uncore, C1DRB3_BW));
> > + } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 4)) {
> > + seq_printf(m, "C0DRB3 = 0x%04x\n",
> > + intel_uncore_read16(uncore, C0DRB3_CL));
> > + seq_printf(m, "C1DRB3 = 0x%04x\n",
> > + intel_uncore_read16(uncore, C1DRB3_CL));
> > + }
> > } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6) {
> > seq_printf(m, "MAD_DIMM_C0 = 0x%08x\n",
> > intel_uncore_read(uncore, MAD_DIMM_C0));
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 0587b2455ea1..055c258179a1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -3790,6 +3790,10 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
> > #define C0DRB3_BW _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE + 0x206)
> > #define C1DRB3_BW _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE + 0x606)
> >
> > +/* 965gm,ctg DRAM channel configuration */
> > +#define C0DRB3_CL _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE + 0x1206)
> > +#define C1DRB3_CL _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE + 0x1306)
> > +
> > /* snb MCH registers for reading the DRAM channel configuration */
> > #define MAD_DIMM_C0 _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5004)
> > #define MAD_DIMM_C1 _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5008)
> > --
> > 2.26.3
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list