[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/display: hide workaround for broken vbt in intel_bios.c

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Wed Apr 28 16:16:53 UTC 2021


On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:02:45AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com> wrote:
>> Instead of poluting the normal code path in intel_display.c, make
>> intel_bios.c handle the brokenness of the VBT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c    | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 ++------------
>>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> index befab891a6b9..e9f828452412 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> @@ -1852,6 +1852,14 @@ intel_bios_encoder_supports_edp(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
>>  		devdata->child.device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_INTERNAL_CONNECTOR;
>>  }
>>
>> +static bool skip_broken_vbt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port)
>> +{
>> +	if (port == PORT_F && (IS_ICELAKE(i915) || IS_CANNONLAKE(i915)))
>> +		return !IS_ICL_WITH_PORT_F(i915) && !IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F(i915);
>> +
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void parse_ddi_port(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>  			   struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
>>  {
>> @@ -1865,6 +1873,13 @@ static void parse_ddi_port(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>  	if (port == PORT_NONE)
>>  		return;
>>
>> +	if (skip_broken_vbt(i915, port)) {
>> +		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
>> +			    "VBT reports port %c as supported, but that can't be true: skipping\n",
>> +			    port_name(port));
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	info = &i915->vbt.ddi_port_info[port];
>>
>>  	if (info->devdata) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index 55f8f2ceada2..64a2a3b9a480 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -10868,15 +10868,7 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
>>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
>>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
>> -
>> -		/*
>> -		 * On some ICL SKUs port F is not present, but broken VBTs mark
>> -		 * the port as present. Only try to initialize port F for the
>> -		 * SKUs that may actually have it.
>> -		 */
>> -		if (IS_ICL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv))
>> -			intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
>> -
>> +		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
>>  		icl_dsi_init(dev_priv);
>>  	} else if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
>>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
>> @@ -10889,9 +10881,7 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
>>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
>>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
>> -
>> -		if (IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv))
>> -			intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
>> +		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
>
>Whoops, not PORT_E, but I guess you noticed. :)

yeah... I had a typo there. I was surprised when I saw CI failing in a
test with PORT_E. After comparing the output when it works vs when I
broke, it was easy to notice what happed.

saved by CI here.

thanks
Lucas De Marchi

>
>
>>  	} else if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
>>  		u32 found;
>
>-- 
>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list