[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 10/18] drm/i915/xehpsdv: Add compute DSS type
Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Wed Aug 4 20:36:37 UTC 2021
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:00:00AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
>From: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers at intel.com>
>
>Starting in XeHP, the concept of slice has been removed in favor of
>DSS (Dual-Subslice) masks for various workload types. These workloads have
>been divided into those enabled for geometry and those enabled for compute.
>
>i915 currently maintains a single set of S/SS/EU masks for the device.
>The goal of this patch set is to minimize the amount of impact to prior
>generations while still giving the user maximum flexibility.
>
>Bspec: 33117, 33118, 20376
>Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
>Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers at intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Steve Hampson <steven.t.hampson at intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h | 5 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +-
> include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 3 --
> 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
>index 16c0552fcd1d..5d3b8dff464c 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
>@@ -46,11 +46,11 @@ u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
> }
>
> void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
>- u32 ss_mask)
>+ u8 *subslice_mask, u32 ss_mask)
> {
> int offset = slice * sseu->ss_stride;
>
>- memcpy(&sseu->subslice_mask[offset], &ss_mask, sseu->ss_stride);
>+ memcpy(&subslice_mask[offset], &ss_mask, sseu->ss_stride);
> }
>
> unsigned int
>@@ -100,14 +100,24 @@ static u16 compute_eu_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
> return total;
> }
>
>-static void gen11_compute_sseu_info(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
>- u8 s_en, u32 ss_en, u16 eu_en)
>+static u32 get_ss_stride_mask(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 s, u32 ss_en)
>+{
>+ u32 ss_mask;
>+
>+ ss_mask = ss_en >> (s * sseu->max_subslices);
>+ ss_mask &= GENMASK(sseu->max_subslices - 1, 0);
>+
>+ return ss_mask;
>+}
>+
>+static void gen11_compute_sseu_info(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 s_en,
>+ u32 g_ss_en, u32 c_ss_en, u16 eu_en)
> {
> int s, ss;
>
>- /* ss_en represents entire subslice mask across all slices */
>+ /* g_ss_en/c_ss_en represent entire subslice mask across all slices */
> GEM_BUG_ON(sseu->max_slices * sseu->max_subslices >
>- sizeof(ss_en) * BITS_PER_BYTE);
>+ sizeof(g_ss_en) * BITS_PER_BYTE);
>
> for (s = 0; s < sseu->max_slices; s++) {
> if ((s_en & BIT(s)) == 0)
>@@ -115,7 +125,23 @@ static void gen11_compute_sseu_info(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
>
> sseu->slice_mask |= BIT(s);
>
>- intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, ss_en);
>+ /*
>+ * XeHP introduces the concept of compute vs
>+ * geometry DSS. To reduce variation between GENs
>+ * around subslice usage, store a mask for both the
>+ * geometry and compute enabled masks, to provide
>+ * to user space later in QUERY_TOPOLOGY_INFO, and
this is not true anymore... I think when this was written the idea was
to use QUERY_TOPOLOGY_INFO's flags field to differentiate between
compute/geometry. However looking at next patches it seems this is not
there anymore: we still check for
if (query_item->flags != 0)
return -EINVAL;
Cc'ing Stuart and Matt Atwood
Also, it would be good to have the patches adding the query as the very
next patch.
Lucas De Marchi
>+ * compute a total enabled subslice count for the
>+ * purposes of selecting subslices to use in a
>+ * particular GEM context.
>+ */
>+ intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, sseu->compute_subslice_mask,
>+ get_ss_stride_mask(sseu, s, c_ss_en));
>+ intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, sseu->geometry_subslice_mask,
>+ get_ss_stride_mask(sseu, s, g_ss_en));
>+ intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, sseu->subslice_mask,
>+ get_ss_stride_mask(sseu, s,
>+ g_ss_en | c_ss_en));
>
> for (ss = 0; ss < sseu->max_subslices; ss++)
> if (intel_sseu_has_subslice(sseu, s, ss))
>@@ -129,7 +155,7 @@ static void gen12_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> {
> struct sseu_dev_info *sseu = >->info.sseu;
> struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
>- u32 dss_en;
>+ u32 g_dss_en, c_dss_en = 0;
> u16 eu_en = 0;
> u8 eu_en_fuse;
> u8 s_en;
>@@ -145,10 +171,12 @@ static void gen12_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> * across the entire device. Then calculate out the DSS for each
> * workload type within that software slice.
> */
>- if (IS_XEHPSDV(gt->i915))
>+ if (IS_XEHPSDV(gt->i915)) {
> intel_sseu_set_info(sseu, 1, 32, 16);
>- else
>+ sseu->has_compute_dss = 1;
>+ } else {
> intel_sseu_set_info(sseu, 1, 6, 16);
>+ }
>
> /*
> * As mentioned above, Xe_HP does not have the concept of a slice.
>@@ -160,7 +188,9 @@ static void gen12_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> s_en = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_GT_SLICE_ENABLE) &
> GEN11_GT_S_ENA_MASK;
>
>- dss_en = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN12_GT_DSS_ENABLE);
>+ g_dss_en = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN12_GT_GEOMETRY_DSS_ENABLE);
>+ if (sseu->has_compute_dss)
>+ c_dss_en = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN12_GT_COMPUTE_DSS_ENABLE);
>
> /* one bit per pair of EUs */
> if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(gt->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50))
>@@ -173,7 +203,7 @@ static void gen12_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> if (eu_en_fuse & BIT(eu))
> eu_en |= BIT(eu * 2) | BIT(eu * 2 + 1);
>
>- gen11_compute_sseu_info(sseu, s_en, dss_en, eu_en);
>+ gen11_compute_sseu_info(sseu, s_en, g_dss_en, c_dss_en, eu_en);
>
> /* TGL only supports slice-level power gating */
> sseu->has_slice_pg = 1;
>@@ -199,7 +229,7 @@ static void gen11_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> eu_en = ~(intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_EU_DISABLE) &
> GEN11_EU_DIS_MASK);
>
>- gen11_compute_sseu_info(sseu, s_en, ss_en, eu_en);
>+ gen11_compute_sseu_info(sseu, s_en, ss_en, 0, eu_en);
>
> /* ICL has no power gating restrictions. */
> sseu->has_slice_pg = 1;
>@@ -260,9 +290,9 @@ static void gen10_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> * Slice0 can have up to 3 subslices, but there are only 2 in
> * slice1/2.
> */
>- intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, s == 0 ?
>- subslice_mask_with_eus :
>- subslice_mask_with_eus & 0x3);
>+ intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, sseu->subslice_mask,
>+ s == 0 ? subslice_mask_with_eus :
>+ subslice_mask_with_eus & 0x3);
> }
>
> sseu->eu_total = compute_eu_total(sseu);
>@@ -317,7 +347,7 @@ static void cherryview_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> sseu_set_eus(sseu, 0, 1, ~disabled_mask);
> }
>
>- intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, 0, subslice_mask);
>+ intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, 0, sseu->subslice_mask, subslice_mask);
>
> sseu->eu_total = compute_eu_total(sseu);
>
>@@ -373,7 +403,8 @@ static void gen9_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> /* skip disabled slice */
> continue;
>
>- intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, subslice_mask);
>+ intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, sseu->subslice_mask,
>+ subslice_mask);
>
> eu_disable = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN9_EU_DISABLE(s));
> for (ss = 0; ss < sseu->max_subslices; ss++) {
>@@ -485,7 +516,8 @@ static void bdw_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> /* skip disabled slice */
> continue;
>
>- intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, subslice_mask);
>+ intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, sseu->subslice_mask,
>+ subslice_mask);
>
> for (ss = 0; ss < sseu->max_subslices; ss++) {
> u8 eu_disabled_mask;
>@@ -583,7 +615,8 @@ static void hsw_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> sseu->eu_per_subslice);
>
> for (s = 0; s < sseu->max_slices; s++) {
>- intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, subslice_mask);
>+ intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, sseu->subslice_mask,
>+ subslice_mask);
>
> for (ss = 0; ss < sseu->max_subslices; ss++) {
> sseu_set_eus(sseu, s, ss,
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
>index 204ea6709460..b383e7d97554 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
>@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ struct drm_printer;
> struct sseu_dev_info {
> u8 slice_mask;
> u8 subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES * GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE];
>+ u8 geometry_subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES * GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE];
>+ u8 compute_subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES * GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE];
> u8 eu_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES * GEN_MAX_SUBSLICES * GEN_MAX_EU_STRIDE];
> u16 eu_total;
> u8 eu_per_subslice;
>@@ -41,6 +43,7 @@ struct sseu_dev_info {
> u8 has_slice_pg:1;
> u8 has_subslice_pg:1;
> u8 has_eu_pg:1;
>+ u8 has_compute_dss:1;
>
> /* Topology fields */
> u8 max_slices;
>@@ -104,7 +107,7 @@ intel_sseu_subslices_per_slice(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
> u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
>
> void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
>- u32 ss_mask);
>+ u8 *subslice_mask, u32 ss_mask);
>
> void intel_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt);
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>index 99858bc593f0..d7e4418955f7 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>@@ -3223,7 +3223,8 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
>
> #define GEN11_GT_SUBSLICE_DISABLE _MMIO(0x913C)
>
>-#define GEN12_GT_DSS_ENABLE _MMIO(0x913C)
>+#define GEN12_GT_GEOMETRY_DSS_ENABLE _MMIO(0x913C)
>+#define GEN12_GT_COMPUTE_DSS_ENABLE _MMIO(0x9144)
>
> #define XEHP_EU_ENABLE _MMIO(0x9134)
> #define XEHP_EU_ENA_MASK 0xFF
>diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>index 7f13d241417f..aef15542a95b 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>@@ -2589,9 +2589,6 @@ struct drm_i915_query {
> * Z / 8] >> (Z % 8)) & 1
> */
> struct drm_i915_query_topology_info {
>- /*
>- * Unused for now. Must be cleared to zero.
>- */
> __u16 flags;
>
> __u16 max_slices;
>--
>2.25.4
>
>_______________________________________________
>Intel-gfx mailing list
>Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list