[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/21] drm/i915/gvt: move the gvt code into kvmgt.ko

[Joonas Lahtinen]

Quoting Christoph Hellwig (2021-07-21 18:53:38)
> Instead of having an option to build the gvt code into the main i915
> module, just move it into the kvmgt.ko module.  This only requires
> a new struct with three entries that the main i915 module needs to
> request before enabling VGPU passthrough operations.
> 
> This also conveniently streamlines the GVT initialization and avoids
> the need for the global device pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>

Hi,

Thanks for putting the work into this. This conversion has been
requested for a long time. For clarity, should we call the module
i915_kvmgt?

How far would we be from dynamically modprobing/rmmoding the kvmgt
module in order to eliminate the enable_gvt parameter?

<SNIP>

> +
> +/*
> + * Exported here so that the exports only get created when GVT support is
> + * actually enabled.
> + */
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_object_alloc, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_object_create_shmem, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_object_init, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_object_pin_map, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(__i915_gem_object_flush_map, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(__i915_gem_object_set_pages, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_gtt_insert, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_prime_export, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_ww_ctx_init, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_ppgtt_create, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_request_add, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_request_create, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_request_wait, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_reserve_fence, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_unreserve_fence, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_vm_release, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_vma_move_to_active, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_context_create, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_context_unpin, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(__intel_context_do_pin, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_ring_begin, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_runtime_pm_get, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_runtime_pm_put_unchecked, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_uncore_forcewake_get, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(intel_uncore_forcewake_put, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(shmem_pin_map, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(shmem_unpin_map, I915_GVT);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(__px_dma, I915_GVT);

This list is also a concern. At the least the double underscore
functions should be eliminated from being exported.

Zhi and Zhenyu, can we have some further patches to clean that up?

Regards, Joonas