[Intel-gfx] missing signoff on drm-intel-gt-next pull

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Quoting Dave Airlie (2021-08-11 06:48:39)
>> dim: db47fe727e1f ("drm/i915/step:
>> s/<platform>_revid_tbl/<platform>_revids"): committer Signed-off-by
>> missing.
>> 
>> I'm not sure how much pain it is to fix that up, but
>> commit db47fe727e1fc516cf60fc9ab8299605ef3c2d54
>> Author: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
>> Commit: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>> 
>>     drm/i915/step: s/<platform>_revid_tbl/<platform>_revids
>> 
>>     Simplify the stepping info array name.
>> 
>>     Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
>>     Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
>>     Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>>     Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
>> 
>> It's definitely missing an S-o-b by anyone who handled the patch.
>> 
>> Let me know if it's insanely painful to fix that.
>
> Added you to the earlier mail thread that discussed the incident.
>
> There are now 277 patches on top of that patch, so means rebasing all of
> those and changing the hashes and trying to fixup all the Fixes:.
>
> So it's painful but not insanely so. Let me know if you want the tree
> rebased.
>
> Regards, Joonas

The commit came in via a topic branch also to drm-intel-next, so that's
another 168 commits to rebase. There's a lot of people working on top of
those trees, so I'm leaning on the very painful side.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center