[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/9] drm: fix potential null ptr dereferences in drm_{auth, ioctl}
Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
desmondcheongzx at gmail.com
Wed Aug 18 15:37:08 UTC 2021
On 18/8/21 6:11 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 03:38:19PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
>> There are three areas where we dereference struct drm_master without
>> checking if the pointer is non-NULL.
>>
>> 1. drm_getmagic is called from the ioctl_handler. Since
>> DRM_IOCTL_GET_MAGIC has no ioctl flags, drm_getmagic is run without
>> any check that drm_file.master has been set.
>>
>> 2. Similarly, drm_getunique is called from the ioctl_handler, but
>> DRM_IOCTL_GET_UNIQUE has no ioctl flags. So there is no guarantee that
>> drm_file.master has been set.
>
> I think the above two are impossible, due to the refcounting rules for
> struct file.
>
Right, will drop those two parts from the patch.
>> 3. drm_master_release can also be called without having a
>> drm_file.master set. Here is one error path:
>> drm_open():
>> drm_open_helper():
>> drm_master_open():
>> drm_new_set_master(); <--- returns -ENOMEM,
>> drm_file.master not set
>> drm_file_free():
>> drm_master_release(); <--- NULL ptr dereference
>> (file_priv->master->magic_map)
>>
>> Fix these by checking if the master pointers are NULL before use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 5 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
>> index f9267b21556e..b7230604496b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
>> @@ -95,11 +95,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_is_current_master);
>> int drm_getmagic(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv)
>> {
>> struct drm_auth *auth = data;
>> + struct drm_master *master;
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&dev->master_mutex);
>> + master = file_priv->master;
>> + if (!master) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&dev->master_mutex);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (!file_priv->magic) {
>> - ret = idr_alloc(&file_priv->master->magic_map, file_priv,
>> + ret = idr_alloc(&master->magic_map, file_priv,
>> 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (ret >= 0)
>> file_priv->magic = ret;
>> @@ -355,8 +362,12 @@ void drm_master_release(struct drm_file *file_priv)
>>
>> mutex_lock(&dev->master_mutex);
>> master = file_priv->master;
>> +
>> + if (!master)
>> + goto unlock;
>
> This is a bit convoluted, since we're in the single-threaded release path
> we don't need any locking for file_priv related things. Therefore we can
> pull the master check out and just directly return.
>
> But since it's a bit surprising maybe a comment that this can happen when
> drm_master_open in drm_open_helper fails?
>
Sounds good. This can actually also happen in the failure path of
mock_drm_getfile if anon_inode_getfile fails. I'll leave a short note
about both of them.
> Another option, and maybe cleaner, would be to move the drm_master_release
> from drm_file_free into drm_close_helper. That would be fully symmetrical
> and should also fix the bug here?
> -Daniel
>
Hmmm maybe the first option to move the check out of the lock might be
better. If I'm not wrong, we would otherwise also need to move
drm_master_release into drm_client_close.
>
>> +
>> if (file_priv->magic)
>> - idr_remove(&file_priv->master->magic_map, file_priv->magic);
>> + idr_remove(&master->magic_map, file_priv->magic);
>>
>> if (!drm_is_current_master_locked(file_priv))
>> goto out;
>> @@ -379,6 +390,7 @@ void drm_master_release(struct drm_file *file_priv)
>> drm_master_put(&file_priv->master);
>> spin_unlock(&dev->master_lookup_lock);
>> }
>> +unlock:
>> mutex_unlock(&dev->master_mutex);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
>> index 26f3a9ede8fe..4d029d3061d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ int drm_getunique(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>>
>> mutex_lock(&dev->master_mutex);
>> master = file_priv->master;
>> + if (!master) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&dev->master_mutex);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (u->unique_len >= master->unique_len) {
>> if (copy_to_user(u->unique, master->unique, master->unique_len)) {
>> mutex_unlock(&dev->master_mutex);
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list