[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 4/7] drm: avoid races with modesetting rights
Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
desmondcheongzx at gmail.com
Mon Aug 30 21:36:01 UTC 2021
On 26/8/21 8:59 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 10:01:19AM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
>> In drm_client_modeset.c and drm_fb_helper.c,
>> drm_master_internal_{acquire,release} are used to avoid races with DRM
>> userspace. These functions hold onto drm_device.master_rwsem while
>> committing, and bail if there's already a master.
>>
>> However, there are other places where modesetting rights can race. A
>> time-of-check-to-time-of-use error can occur if an ioctl that changes
>> the modeset has its rights revoked after it validates its permissions,
>> but before it completes.
>>
>> There are four places where modesetting permissions can change:
>>
>> - DROP_MASTER ioctl removes rights for a master and its leases
>>
>> - REVOKE_LEASE ioctl revokes rights for a specific lease
>>
>> - SET_MASTER ioctl sets the device master if the master role hasn't
>> been acquired yet
>>
>> - drm_open which can create a new master for a device if one does not
>> currently exist
>>
>> These races can be avoided using drm_device.master_rwsem: users that
>> perform modesetting should hold a read lock on the new
>> drm_device.master_rwsem, and users that change these permissions
>> should hold a write lock.
>>
>> To avoid deadlocks with master_rwsem, for ioctls that need to check
>> for modesetting permissions, but also need to hold a write lock on
>> master_rwsem to protect some other attribute (or recurses to some
>> function that holds a write lock, like drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl
>> which eventually calls drm_master_open), we remove the DRM_MASTER flag
>> and push the master_rwsem lock and permissions check into the ioctl.
>>
>> Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>> Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c | 4 ++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> include/drm/drm_device.h | 5 +++++
>> 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
>> index 73ade0513ccb..65065f7e1499 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
>> @@ -120,6 +120,10 @@ int drm_authmagic(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>> DRM_DEBUG("%u\n", auth->magic);
>>
>> down_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
>> + if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master(file_priv))) {
>> + up_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
>> + return -EACCES;
>> + }
>> file = idr_find(&file_priv->master->magic_map, auth->magic);
>> if (file) {
>> file->authenticated = 1;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
>> index 158629d88319..8bea39ffc5c0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
>> @@ -386,6 +386,10 @@ static int drm_setversion(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *f
>> int if_version, retcode = 0;
>>
>> down_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
>> + if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master(file_priv))) {
>> + retcode = -EACCES;
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> if (sv->drm_di_major != -1) {
>> if (sv->drm_di_major != DRM_IF_MAJOR ||
>> sv->drm_di_minor < 0 || sv->drm_di_minor > DRM_IF_MINOR) {
>> @@ -420,8 +424,9 @@ static int drm_setversion(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *f
>> sv->drm_di_minor = DRM_IF_MINOR;
>> sv->drm_dd_major = dev->driver->major;
>> sv->drm_dd_minor = dev->driver->minor;
>> - up_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
>>
>> +unlock:
>> + up_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
>> return retcode;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -574,12 +579,12 @@ static const struct drm_ioctl_desc drm_ioctls[] = {
>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_GET_STATS, drm_getstats, 0),
>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_GET_CAP, drm_getcap, DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SET_CLIENT_CAP, drm_setclientcap, 0),
>> - DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SET_VERSION, drm_setversion, DRM_MASTER),
>> + DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SET_VERSION, drm_setversion, 0),
>
> Random bikeshed, if you're bored: In newer code we've given ioctl
> callbacks an _ioctl suffix, so they'r easier to spot. Could do that in a
> follow-up if you want.
>
Makes sense, this was a small pain point when auditing the ioctl
functions. I'll do this on a rainier day.
>>
>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SET_UNIQUE, drm_invalid_op, DRM_AUTH|DRM_MASTER|DRM_ROOT_ONLY),
>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_BLOCK, drm_noop, DRM_AUTH|DRM_MASTER|DRM_ROOT_ONLY),
>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_UNBLOCK, drm_noop, DRM_AUTH|DRM_MASTER|DRM_ROOT_ONLY),
>> - DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_AUTH_MAGIC, drm_authmagic, DRM_MASTER),
>> + DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_AUTH_MAGIC, drm_authmagic, 0),
>>
>> DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_ADD_MAP, drm_legacy_addmap_ioctl, DRM_AUTH|DRM_MASTER|DRM_ROOT_ONLY),
>> DRM_LEGACY_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_RM_MAP, drm_legacy_rmmap_ioctl, DRM_AUTH),
>> @@ -706,10 +711,10 @@ static const struct drm_ioctl_desc drm_ioctls[] = {
>> DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_CRTC_GET_SEQUENCE, drm_crtc_get_sequence_ioctl, 0),
>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_CRTC_QUEUE_SEQUENCE, drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl, 0),
>> - DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATE_LEASE, drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl, DRM_MASTER),
>> + DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATE_LEASE, drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl, 0),
>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_LIST_LESSEES, drm_mode_list_lessees_ioctl, DRM_MASTER),
>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GET_LEASE, drm_mode_get_lease_ioctl, DRM_MASTER),
>> - DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_REVOKE_LEASE, drm_mode_revoke_lease_ioctl, DRM_MASTER),
>> + DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_REVOKE_LEASE, drm_mode_revoke_lease_ioctl, 0),
>> };
>>
>> #define DRM_CORE_IOCTL_COUNT ARRAY_SIZE( drm_ioctls )
>> @@ -776,6 +781,9 @@ long drm_ioctl_kernel(struct file *file, drm_ioctl_t *func, void *kdata,
>> if (unlikely(drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY)) && !(flags & DRM_UNLOCKED))
>> mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex);
>>
>> + if (unlikely(flags & DRM_MASTER))
>> + down_read(&dev->master_rwsem);
>> +
>> retcode = drm_ioctl_permit(flags, file_priv);
>> if (unlikely(retcode))
>> goto out;
>> @@ -783,6 +791,8 @@ long drm_ioctl_kernel(struct file *file, drm_ioctl_t *func, void *kdata,
>> retcode = func(dev, kdata, file_priv);
>>
>> out:
>> + if (unlikely(flags & DRM_MASTER))
>> + up_read(&dev->master_rwsem);
>> if (unlikely(drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY)) && !(flags & DRM_UNLOCKED))
>> mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex);
>> return retcode;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c
>> index dee4f24a1808..bed6f7636cbe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c
>> @@ -500,6 +500,18 @@ int drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + /* Clone the lessor file to create a new file for us */
>> + DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("Allocating lease file\n");
>> + lessee_file = file_clone_open(lessor_file);
>> + if (IS_ERR(lessee_file))
>> + return PTR_ERR(lessee_file);
>> +
>> + down_read(&dev->master_rwsem);
>> + if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master(lessor_priv))) {
>> + ret = -EACCES;
>> + goto out_file;
>> + }
>> +
>> lessor = drm_file_get_master(lessor_priv);
>> /* Do not allow sub-leases */
>> if (lessor->lessor) {
>> @@ -547,14 +559,6 @@ int drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>> goto out_leases;
>> }
>>
>> - /* Clone the lessor file to create a new file for us */
>> - DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("Allocating lease file\n");
>> - lessee_file = file_clone_open(lessor_file);
>> - if (IS_ERR(lessee_file)) {
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(lessee_file);
>> - goto out_lessee;
>> - }
>> -
>> lessee_priv = lessee_file->private_data;
>> /* Change the file to a master one */
>> drm_master_put(&lessee_priv->master);
>> @@ -571,17 +575,19 @@ int drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>> fd_install(fd, lessee_file);
>>
>> drm_master_put(&lessor);
>
> Hm if we're unlucky this might be the last reference (against nasty
> userspace only), and that could then perhaps collide with us still holding
> the lock. It looks like we're fine, the only thing that drm_master_put
> might be locking is
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
>
> through drm_lease_destroy(). We don't care about legacy drivers and hence
> the dev->struct_mutex (plus that lock is a complete mess anyway).
>
> Maybe another patch to add a might_lock to drm_master_put, just to be
> safe?
>
Sounds good.
I agree that we should be safe for now, since we're taking efforts to
make master_rwsem an outer lock, especially after we take your later
suggestion to remove the lock from drm_file_get_master and
drm_is_current_master.
>> + up_read(&dev->master_rwsem);
>> DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl succeeded\n");
>> return 0;
>>
>> -out_lessee:
>> - drm_master_put(&lessee);
>> -
>> out_leases:
>> put_unused_fd(fd);
>>
>> out_lessor:
>> drm_master_put(&lessor);
>> +
>> +out_file:
>> + up_read(&dev->master_rwsem);
>> + fput(lessee_file);
>> DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl failed: %d\n", ret);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -705,6 +711,11 @@ int drm_mode_revoke_lease_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>> if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>> + down_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
>> + if (unlikely(!drm_is_current_master(lessor_priv))) {
>> + ret = -EACCES;
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> lessor = drm_file_get_master(lessor_priv);
>> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
>>
>> @@ -728,5 +739,7 @@ int drm_mode_revoke_lease_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>> mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
>> drm_master_put(&lessor);
>>
>> +unlock:
>> + up_write(&dev->master_rwsem);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_device.h b/include/drm/drm_device.h
>> index 142fb2f6e74d..7d32bb69e6db 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_device.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_device.h
>> @@ -151,6 +151,11 @@ struct drm_device {
>> * Lock for &drm_device.master, &drm_file.was_master,
>> * &drm_file.is_master, &drm_file.master, &drm_master.unique,
>> * &drm_master.unique_len, and &drm_master.magic_map.
>> + *
>> + * Additionally, synchronizes modesetting rights between multiple users.
>
> Current modern drives only use this for modesetting rights, but this is
> about anything which is exclusively owned by the drm_master. So maybe
> reword to "synchronizes access rights to exclusive resources like
> modesetting access".
>
Right, will do.
> With that clarified:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>
> The other suggestions are for follow-up patches, if you feel like.
> -Daniel
>
>> + * Users that can change the modeset or display state must hold a read
>> + * lock on @master_rwsem, and users that change modesetting rights
>> + * should hold a write lock.
>> */
>> struct rw_semaphore master_rwsem;
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list