[Intel-gfx] [v3 0/3] Introduce Raptor Lake S

[Srivatsa, Anusha]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Srivatsa, Anusha
> Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 9:59 AM
> To: 'Tvrtko Ursulin' <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>; intel-
> gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: x86 at kernel.org; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; Ingo Molnar
> <mingo at redhat.com>; Borislav Petkov <bp at alien8.de>; Dave Hansen
> <dave.hansen at linux.intel.com>; Joonas Lahtinen
> <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>; Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [v3 0/3] Introduce Raptor Lake S
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 2:57 PM
> > To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>; intel-
> > gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: x86 at kernel.org; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; Ingo Molnar
> > <mingo at redhat.com>; Borislav Petkov <bp at alien8.de>; Dave Hansen
> > <dave.hansen at linux.intel.com>; Joonas Lahtinen
> > <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>; Nikula, Jani
> > <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [v3 0/3] Introduce Raptor Lake S
> >
> >
> > On 03/12/2021 06:35, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
> > > Raptor Lake S(RPL-S) is a version 12 Display, Media and Render. For
> > > all i915 purposes it is the same as Alder Lake S (ADL-S).
> > >
> > > The series introduces it as a subplatform of ADL-S. The one
> > > difference is the GuC submission which is default on RPL-S but was
> > > not the case with ADL-S.
> >
> > As a side note, not a blocker of any kind, I am slightly disheartened
> > but the confusion of ADL_P and ADL_S being separate platforms, but
> > then RPL_S is subplatform of ADL_S. Maybe it is just me not being able
> > to keep track of things.
> >
> > > All patches are reviewed. Jani has acked the series.
> > > Looking for other acks in order to merge these to respective branches.
> >
> > Which branches would that be for this series? First two to
> > drm-intel-next and last one to drm-intel-gt-next? Is that complication
> > needed and/or worth the effort?
> 
> Tvrtko,
>  All three have to land to drm-intel-next. The last one has dependency on the
> first patch and is a trivial change.

@Ursulin, Tvrtko @Joonas Lahtinen can I get an ack to merge these into drm-intel-next branch?


Anusha
> Anusha
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tvrtko
> >
> > > Cc: x86 at kernel.org
> > > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp at alien8.de>
> > > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
> > > Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > >
> > > Anusha Srivatsa (3):
> > >    drm/i915/rpl-s: Add PCI IDS for Raptor Lake S
> > >    drm/i915/rpl-s: Add PCH Support for Raptor Lake S
> > >    drm/i915/rpl-s: Enable guc submission by default
> > >
> > >   arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c           | 1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c    | 2 +-
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          | 2 ++
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c          | 1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 7 +++++++
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 3 +++
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c         | 1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h         | 1 +
> > >   include/drm/i915_pciids.h                | 9 +++++++++
> > >   9 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >