[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/11] drm/i915/pxp: Use to_gt() helper

[Matt Roper]

On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 03:25:09PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Use to_gt() helper consistently throughout the codebase.
> Pure mechanical s/i915->gt/to_gt(i915). No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> index 5d169624ad60..726c2b5a3fa3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> @@ -14,9 +14,11 @@
>  #include "intel_pxp_tee.h"
>  #include "intel_pxp_tee_interface.h"
>  
> -static inline struct intel_pxp *i915_dev_to_pxp(struct device *i915_kdev)
> +static  struct intel_pxp *i915_dev_to_pxp(struct device *i915_kdev)

Was dropping the inline here intentional?  It doesn't seem like there's
any reason to drop it, and if it was intentional the whitespace isn't
quite right.


Matt

>  {
> -	return &kdev_to_i915(i915_kdev)->gt.pxp;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = kdev_to_i915(i915_kdev);
> +
> +	return &to_gt(i915)->pxp;
>  }
>  
>  static int intel_pxp_tee_io_message(struct intel_pxp *pxp,
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795