[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 4/6] drm: implement a method to free unused pages
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Mon Dec 13 18:40:45 UTC 2021
On 01/12/2021 16:39, Arunpravin wrote:
> On contiguous allocation, we round up the size
> to the *next* power of 2, implement a function
> to free the unused pages after the newly allocate block.
>
> v2(Matthew Auld):
> - replace function name 'drm_buddy_free_unused_pages' with
> drm_buddy_block_trim
> - replace input argument name 'actual_size' with 'new_size'
> - add more validation checks for input arguments
> - add overlaps check to avoid needless searching and splitting
> - merged the below patch to see the feature in action
> - add free unused pages support to i915 driver
> - lock drm_buddy_block_trim() function as it calls mark_free/mark_split
> are all globally visible
>
> v3:
> - remove drm_buddy_block_trim() error handling and
> print a warn message if it fails
>
> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c | 10 +++
> include/drm/drm_buddy.h | 4 ++
> 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> index eddc1eeda02e..707efc82216d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,8 @@ alloc_from_freelist(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
> static int __alloc_range(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
> struct list_head *dfs,
> u64 start, u64 size,
> - struct list_head *blocks)
> + struct list_head *blocks,
> + bool trim_path)
> {
> struct drm_buddy_block *block;
> struct drm_buddy_block *buddy;
> @@ -480,8 +481,20 @@ static int __alloc_range(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
>
> if (!drm_buddy_block_is_split(block)) {
> err = split_block(mm, block);
> - if (unlikely(err))
> + if (unlikely(err)) {
> + if (trim_path)
> + /*
> + * Here in case of trim, we return and dont goto
> + * split failure path as it removes from the
> + * original list and potentially also freeing
> + * the block. so we could leave as it is,
> + * worse case we get some internal fragmentation
> + * and leave the decision to the user
> + */
> + return err;
Hmm, ideally we don't want to leave around blocks where both buddies are
free without then also merging them back(not sure if that trips some
BUG_ON). Also IIUC, if we hit this failure path, depending on where the
split_block() fails we might be allocating something less than new_size?
Also if it's the first split_block() that fails then the user just gets
an empty list?
Could we perhaps just turn this node into a temporary root node to
prevent recursively freeing itself, but still retain the
un-splitting/freeing of the other nodes i.e something like:
list_del(&block->link);
mark_free(mm, block);
mm->avail += ...;
/* Prevent recursively freeing this node */
parent = block->parent;
block->parent = NULL;
list_add(&block->tmp_link, &dfs);
ret = _alloc_range(mm, &dfs, new_start, new_size, blocks);
if (ret) {
mem->avail -= ...;
mark_allocated(block);
list_add(&block->link, blocks);
}
block->parent = parent;
return ret;
That way we can also drop the special trim_path handling. Thoughts?
> +
> goto err_undo;
> + }
> }
>
> list_add(&block->right->tmp_link, dfs);
> @@ -535,8 +548,61 @@ static int __drm_buddy_alloc_range(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
> for (i = 0; i < mm->n_roots; ++i)
> list_add_tail(&mm->roots[i]->tmp_link, &dfs);
>
> - return __alloc_range(mm, &dfs, start, size, blocks);
> + return __alloc_range(mm, &dfs, start, size, blocks, 0);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_buddy_block_trim - free unused pages
> + *
> + * @mm: DRM buddy manager
> + * @new_size: original size requested
> + * @blocks: output list head to add allocated blocks
> + *
> + * For contiguous allocation, we round up the size to the nearest
> + * power of two value, drivers consume *actual* size, so remaining
> + * portions are unused and it can be freed.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 on success, error code on failure.
> + */
> +int drm_buddy_block_trim(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
> + u64 new_size,
> + struct list_head *blocks)
> +{
> + struct drm_buddy_block *block;
> + u64 new_start;
> + LIST_HEAD(dfs);
> +
> + if (!list_is_singular(blocks))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + block = list_first_entry(blocks,
> + struct drm_buddy_block,
> + link);
> +
> + if (!drm_buddy_block_is_allocated(block))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (new_size > drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!new_size && !IS_ALIGNED(new_size, mm->chunk_size))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (new_size == drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block))
> + return 0;
> +
> + list_del(&block->link);
> +
> + new_start = drm_buddy_block_offset(block);
> +
> + mark_free(mm, block);
> +
> + list_add(&block->tmp_link, &dfs);
> +
> + return __alloc_range(mm, &dfs, new_start, new_size, blocks, 1);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_buddy_block_trim);
>
> /**
> * drm_buddy_alloc - allocate power-of-two blocks
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c
> index 7c58efb60dba..c5831c27fe82 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,16 @@ static int i915_ttm_buddy_man_alloc(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> if (unlikely(err))
> goto err_free_blocks;
>
> + if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) {
> + mutex_lock(&bman->lock);
> + err = drm_buddy_block_trim(mm,
> + (u64)n_pages << PAGE_SHIFT,
> + &bman_res->blocks);
> + mutex_unlock(&bman->lock);
> + pr_warn("drm_buddy_block_trim failed returing %d for ttm_buffer_object(%p)\n",
> + err, bo);
IIUC this prints a warning even for success? Anyway, I think we can drop
the pr_warn, since normal user can't really do much here?
> + }
> +
> *res = &bman_res->base;
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
> index 316ac0d25f08..90906d9dbbf0 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,10 @@ int drm_buddy_alloc(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
> struct list_head *blocks,
> unsigned long flags);
>
> +int drm_buddy_block_trim(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
> + u64 new_size,
> + struct list_head *blocks);
> +
> void drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm, struct drm_buddy_block *block);
>
> void drm_buddy_free_list(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm, struct list_head *objects);
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list