[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/amdgpu: Ensure kunmap is called on error
Ira Weiny
ira.weiny at intel.com
Tue Dec 14 03:37:25 UTC 2021
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:37:32PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 11.12.21 um 00:24 schrieb ira.weiny at intel.com:
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny at intel.com>
> >
> > The default case leaves the buffer object mapped in error.
> >
> > Add amdgpu_bo_kunmap() to that case to ensure the mapping is cleaned up.
>
> Mhm, good catch. But why do you want to do this in the first place?
I'm not sure I understand the question.
Any mapping of memory should be paired with an unmapping when no longer needed.
And this is supported by the call to amdgpu_bo_kunmap() in the other
non-default cases.
Do you believe the mapping is not needed?
Ira
>
> Christian.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny at intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> > NOTE: It seems like this function could use a fair bit of refactoring
> > but this is the easiest way to fix the actual bug.
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > nice
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> > index 6f8de11a17f1..b3ffd0f6b35f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> > @@ -889,6 +889,7 @@ static int amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg(struct amdgpu_uvd_cs_ctx *ctx,
> > return 0;
> > default:
> > + amdgpu_bo_kunmap(bo);
> > DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
> > }
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list