[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 07/11] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Add alive-ness test after error capture

[John Harrison]

On 12/15/2021 23:23, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 03:29:10PM -0800, John.C.Harrison at Intel.com wrote:
>> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>>
>> Added a an extra step to the i915_hangman tests to check that the
>> system is still alive after the hang and recovery. This submits a
>> simple batch to each engine which does a write to memory and checks
>> that the write occurred.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/i915/i915_hangman.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c b/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
>> index b77705206..20653b479 100644
>> --- a/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
>> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
>> @@ -47,8 +47,113 @@
>>   static int device = -1;
>>   static int sysfs = -1;
>>   
>> +#define OFFSET_ALIVE	10
>> +
>>   IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Tests for hang detection and recovery");
>>   
>> +/* Requires master for STORE_DWORD on gen4/5 */
>> +static void store(int fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
>> +		  int fence, uint32_t target, unsigned offset_value)
>> +{
>> +	const int SCRATCH = 0;
>> +	const int BATCH = 1;
>> +	const int gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(fd));
>> +	struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj[2];
>> +	struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry reloc;
>> +	struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
>> +	uint32_t batch[16];
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	memset(&execbuf, 0, sizeof(execbuf));
>> +	execbuf.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(obj);
>> +	execbuf.buffer_count = ARRAY_SIZE(obj);
>> +	execbuf.flags = e->flags;
>> +	if (fence != -1) {
>> +		execbuf.flags |= I915_EXEC_FENCE_IN;
>> +		execbuf.rsvd2 = fence;
>> +	}
>> +	if (gen < 6)
>> +		execbuf.flags |= I915_EXEC_SECURE;
>> +
>> +	memset(obj, 0, sizeof(obj));
>> +	obj[SCRATCH].handle = target;
>> +
>> +	obj[BATCH].handle = gem_create(fd, 4096);
>> +	obj[BATCH].relocs_ptr = to_user_pointer(&reloc);
>> +	obj[BATCH].relocation_count = 1;
>> +	memset(&reloc, 0, sizeof(reloc));
>> +
>> +	i = 0;
>> +	reloc.target_handle = obj[SCRATCH].handle;
>> +	reloc.presumed_offset = -1;
>> +	reloc.offset = sizeof(uint32_t) * (i + 1);
>> +	reloc.delta = sizeof(uint32_t) * offset_value;
>> +	reloc.read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION;
>> +	reloc.write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION;
>> +	batch[i] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM | (gen < 6 ? 1 << 22 : 0);
>> +	if (gen >= 8) {
>> +		batch[++i] = reloc.delta;
>> +		batch[++i] = 0;
>> +	} else if (gen >= 4) {
>> +		batch[++i] = 0;
>> +		batch[++i] = reloc.delta;
>> +		reloc.offset += sizeof(uint32_t);
>> +	} else {
>> +		batch[i]--;
>> +		batch[++i] = reloc.delta;
>> +	}
>> +	batch[++i] = offset_value;
>> +	batch[++i] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
>> +	gem_write(fd, obj[BATCH].handle, 0, batch, sizeof(batch));
>> +	gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf);
>> +	gem_close(fd, obj[BATCH].handle);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void check_alive(void)
>> +{
>> +	const struct intel_execution_engine2 *engine;
>> +	const intel_ctx_t *ctx;
>> +	uint32_t scratch, *out;
>> +	int fd, i = 0;
>> +	uint64_t ahnd;
>> +
>> +	fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>> +	igt_require(gem_class_can_store_dword(fd, 0));
>> +
>> +	ctx = intel_ctx_create_all_physical(fd);
>> +	ahnd = get_reloc_ahnd(fd, ctx->id);
>> +	scratch = gem_create(fd, 4096);
>> +	out = gem_mmap__wc(fd, scratch, 0, 4096, PROT_WRITE);
>> +	gem_set_domain(fd, scratch,
>> +			I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
>> +
>> +	for_each_physical_engine(fd, engine) {
>> +		igt_assert_eq_u32(out[i + OFFSET_ALIVE], 0);
>> +		i++;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	i = 0;
>> +	for_each_ctx_engine(fd, ctx, engine) {
>> +		if (!gem_class_can_store_dword(fd, engine->class))
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		/* +OFFSET_ALIVE to ensure engine zero doesn't get a false negative */
>> +		store(fd, engine, -1, scratch, i + OFFSET_ALIVE);
> You need to pass ctx + ahnd to store() to add softpin path. Relocs
> won't work above Tigerlake.
There didn't seem much point in reworking the code in this file when it 
is going to be removed in the next patch. I might just re-order the two 
for the next rev. Create the helper first and then never actually add 
the almost-duplicate here at all.

John.

>
> --
> Zbigniew
>
>
>> +		i++;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	gem_set_domain(fd, scratch, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, 0);
>> +
>> +	while (i--)
>> +		igt_assert_eq_u32(out[i + OFFSET_ALIVE], i + OFFSET_ALIVE);
>> +
>> +	munmap(out, 4096);
>> +	gem_close(fd, scratch);
>> +	put_ahnd(ahnd);
>> +	intel_ctx_destroy(fd, ctx);
>> +	close(fd);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static bool has_error_state(int dir)
>>   {
>>   	bool result;
>> @@ -230,6 +335,8 @@ static void test_error_state_capture(const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
>>   	check_error_state(e->name, offset, batch);
>>   	munmap(batch, 4096);
>>   	put_ahnd(ahnd);
>> +
>> +	check_alive();
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void
>> @@ -288,6 +395,8 @@ test_engine_hang(const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
>>   		put_ahnd(ahndN);
>>   	}
>>   	put_ahnd(ahnd);
>> +
>> +	check_alive();
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int hang_count;
>> @@ -320,6 +429,8 @@ static void test_hang_detector(const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
>>   
>>   	/* Did it work? */
>>   	igt_assert(hang_count == 1);
>> +
>> +	check_alive();
>>   }
>>   
>>   /* This test covers the case where we end up in an uninitialised area of the
>> @@ -355,6 +466,8 @@ static void hangcheck_unterminated(const intel_ctx_t *ctx)
>>   		igt_force_gpu_reset(device);
>>   		igt_assert_f(0, "unterminated batch did not trigger a hang!");
>>   	}
>> +
>> +	check_alive();
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void do_tests(const char *name, const char *prefix,
>> @@ -432,6 +545,8 @@ igt_main
>>   		igt_assert(sysfs != -1);
>>   
>>   		igt_require(has_error_state(sysfs));
>> +
>> +		gem_require_mmap_wc(device);
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	igt_describe("Basic error capture");
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>