[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] intel_gpu_top: Wrap interactive header

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-03 10:31:04)
> 
> On 01/02/2021 12:07, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-01 11:57:56)
> >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> >>
> >> Slight improvement with regards to wrapping header components to fit
> >> console width. If a single element is wider than max it can still
> >> overflow but it should now work better for practical console widths.
> > 
> > <----
> > intel-gpu-top: Intel Kabylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0
> >   900/ 949 MHz;   0% RC6;  6.97/18.42 W;        2 irqs/s
> >        IMC reads:        6 MiB/s
> >       IMC writes:        0 MiB/s
> > 
> > ---->
> > intel-gpu-top: Intel Kabylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0 -  903/ 954 MHz;   0% RC6
> >      7.16/18.40 W;       14 irqs/s
> > 
> >        IMC reads:       80 MiB/s
> >       IMC writes:        0 MiB/s
> > 
> > I thought it looked reasonably tidy, without adding any lines to the
> > header.
> 
> Or on a wider terminal:
> <----
> intel-gpu-top: Intel Skylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0
>     0/   0 MHz; 100% RC6;  0.00/ 1.29 W;        0 irqs/s
>        IMC reads:      138 MiB/s
>       IMC writes:        6 MiB/s
> --->
> intel-gpu-top: Intel Skylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0 -    0/   0 MHz; 100% RC6;  0.00/ 0.00 W;        0 irqs/s
> 
>        IMC reads:       77 MiB/s
>       IMC writes:        4 MiB/s
> 
> 
> So a "fight" between 80 chars vs 120 (or so). :) It may be a bit of an over-engineered solution but I don't like the wrap on a wide terminal, plus I like an extra blank line.

But the memory counters are visually similar to the
frequency/rc6/power/interrupts...
-Chris