[Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with the drm-misc tree
Andy Shevchenko
andy.shevchenko at gmail.com
Thu Feb 4 09:04:27 UTC 2021
On Thursday, February 4, 2021, Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drivers-x86 tree got a conflict in:
>
>
Thanks. I already asked Patrick yesterday day if DRM missed to pull an
immutable tag I provided. I think they can pull and resolve conflicts
themselves. Alternatively it would be easy to resolve by Linus by removing
Kconfig lines along with mentioned files,
> drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/Kconfig
> drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mdfld_device.c
> drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mdfld_dsi_output.c
> drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mdfld_output.c
> drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/tc35876x-dsi-lvds.c
>
> between commits:
>
> b51035c200bd ("drm/gma500: Remove Medfield support")
> 837f23bb4b60 ("drm/gma500: Drop DRM_GMA3600 config option")
>
> from the drm-misc tree and commit:
>
> bfc838f8598e ("drm/gma500: Convert to use new SCU IPC API")
> 25ded39ad064 ("drm/gma500: Get rid of duplicate NULL checks")
>
> from the drivers-x86 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former removed the text that was updated by the
> latter and removed the last 4 files) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20210204/f3369d76/attachment.htm>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list