[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] RFC: dma-buf: Require VM_SPECIAL vma for mmap

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:13 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at ziepe.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:19:48PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > tldr; DMA buffers aren't normal memory, expecting that you can use
> > them like that (like calling get_user_pages works, or that they're
> > accounting like any other normal memory) cannot be guaranteed.
> >
> > Since some userspace only runs on integrated devices, where all
> > buffers are actually all resident system memory, there's a huge
> > temptation to assume that a struct page is always present and useable
> > like for any more pagecache backed mmap. This has the potential to
> > result in a uapi nightmare.
> >
> > To stop this gap require that DMA buffer mmaps are VM_SPECIAL, which
> > blocks get_user_pages and all the other struct page based
> > infrastructure for everyone. In spirit this is the uapi counterpart to
> > the kernel-internal CONFIG_DMABUF_DEBUG.
>
> Fast gup needs the special flag set on the PTE as well.. Feels weird
> to have a special VMA without also having special PTEs?

There's kinda no convenient & cheap way to check for the pte_special
flag. This here should at least catch accidental misuse, people
building their own ptes we can't stop. Maybe we should exclude
VM_MIXEDMAP to catch vm_insert_page in one of these.

Hm looking at code I think we need to require VM_PFNMAP here to stop
vm_insert_page. And looking at the various functions, that seems to be
required (and I guess VM_IO is more for really funky architectures
where io-space is somewhere else?). I guess I should check for
VM_PFNMAP instead of VM_SPECIAL?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch