[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915/icp+: Use icp_hpd_irq_setup() instead of spt_hpd_irq_setup()

[Lyude Paul]

While reviewing patches for handling workarounds related to gen9 bc, Imre
from Intel discovered that we're using spt_hpd_irq_setup() on ICP+ PCHs
despite it being almost the same as icp_hpd_irq_setup(). Since we need to
be calling icp_hpd_irq_setup() to ensure that CML-S/TGP platforms function
correctly anyway, let's move platforms using PCH_ICP which aren't handled
by gen11_hpd_irq_setup() over to icp_hpd_irq_setup().

Cc: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index f86b147f588f..7ec61187a315 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -4320,6 +4320,8 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = gen11_hpd_irq_setup;
 		else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
 			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = bxt_hpd_irq_setup;
+		else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_ICP)
+			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = icp_hpd_irq_setup;
 		else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_SPT)
 			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = spt_hpd_irq_setup;
 		else
-- 
2.29.2