[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/pps: Reuse POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE in pps_{lock, unlock}
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Fri Jan 8 09:38:04 UTC 2021
On Thu, 07 Jan 2021, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com> wrote:
> We need a power_domain wakeref in pps_{lock,unlock} to prevent
> a race while resetting pps state in intel_power_sequencer_reset().
>
> intel_power_sequencer_reset() need a pps_mutex to access pps_pipe
> but it can't grab pps_mutex due to deadlock with power_well
> functions are called while holding pps_mutex.
> intel_power_sequencer_reset() is called by power_well function
> associated with legacy platforms like vlv and chv therefore re-use
> the POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE power domain, which only used
> by vlv and chv display power domain.
>
> This will avoids the unnecessary noise of unrelated power wells
> in pps_{lock,unlock}.
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
Imre convinced me yesterday on irc that this should work.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
On the surface, this reduces the need to enable/disable the aux power so
much. It's unnecessary, so it stands to reason to optimize it. We should
only grab the domain references we actually need.
However, this *also* papers over an issue we've been seeing [1]. We need
to be aware the root cause for that remains unknown, and needs to be
figured out.
I presume simply doing aux transfers won't reproduce the problem,
because that disables the power asynchronously since commit f39194a7a8b9
("drm/i915: Disable power asynchronously during DP AUX
transfers"). Perhaps we wouldn't have seen this at all if pps_unlock()
also did that as suggested in the commit message.
Anyway, I'd like to get acks or rb's from Imre and Ville before merging
this.
BR,
Jani.
[1] http://lore.kernel.org/r/20201204081845.26528-1-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 8a00e609085f..4f190a82d4ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -895,9 +895,7 @@ pps_lock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> * See intel_power_sequencer_reset() why we need
> * a power domain reference here.
> */
> - wakeref = intel_display_power_get(dev_priv,
> - intel_aux_power_domain(dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)));
> -
> + wakeref = intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE);
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pps_mutex);
>
> return wakeref;
> @@ -909,9 +907,7 @@ pps_unlock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, intel_wakeref_t wakeref)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pps_mutex);
> - intel_display_power_put(dev_priv,
> - intel_aux_power_domain(dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)),
> - wakeref);
> + intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE, wakeref);
> return 0;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list