[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Rearrange ktime_get to reduce latency against CS
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Jan 8 10:56:08 UTC 2021
In our tests where we measure the elapsed time on both the CPU and CS
using a udelay, our CS results match the udelay much more accurately
than the ktime (even when using ktime_get_fast_ns). With preemption
disabled, we can go one step lower than ktime and use local_clock.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2919
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c
index ca080445695e..c3d965279fc3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c
@@ -112,11 +112,11 @@ static int __measure_timestamps(struct intel_context *ce,
/* Run the request for a 100us, sampling timestamps before/after */
preempt_disable();
- *dt = ktime_get_raw_fast_ns();
+ *dt = local_clock();
write_semaphore(&sema[2], 0);
udelay(100);
+ *dt = local_clock() - *dt;
write_semaphore(&sema[2], 1);
- *dt = ktime_get_raw_fast_ns() - *dt;
preempt_enable();
if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0) {
--
2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list