[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/47] drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC
John Harrison
john.c.harrison at intel.com
Sat Jul 10 00:16:34 UTC 2021
On 6/24/2021 00:04, Matthew Brost wrote:
> When running the GuC the GPU can't be considered idle if the GuC still
> has contexts pinned. As such, a call has been added in
> intel_gt_wait_for_idle to idle the UC and in turn the GuC by waiting for
> the number of unpinned contexts to go to zero.
>
> v2: rtimeout -> remaining_timeout
>
> Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 19 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c | 22 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h | 9 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 4 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h | 4 +
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h | 5 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c | 1 +
> .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c | 2 +-
> .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c | 3 +-
> 14 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> index 2fd155742bd2..335b955d5b4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> @@ -644,7 +644,8 @@ mmap_offset_attach(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> goto insert;
>
> /* Attempt to reap some mmap space from dead objects */
> - err = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(&i915->gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> + err = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(&i915->gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT,
> + NULL);
> if (err)
> goto err;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> index e714e21c0a4d..acfdd53b2678 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> @@ -585,6 +585,25 @@ static void __intel_gt_disable(struct intel_gt *gt)
> GEM_BUG_ON(intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt));
> }
>
> +int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout)
> +{
> + long remaining_timeout;
> +
> + /* If the device is asleep, we have no requests outstanding */
> + if (!intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt))
> + return 0;
> +
> + while ((timeout = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, timeout,
> + &remaining_timeout)) > 0) {
> + cond_resched();
> + if (signal_pending(current))
> + return -EINTR;
> + }
> +
> + return timeout ? timeout : intel_uc_wait_for_idle(>->uc,
> + remaining_timeout);
> +}
> +
> int intel_gt_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> {
> int err;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> index e7aabe0cc5bf..74e771871a9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ void intel_gt_driver_release(struct intel_gt *gt);
>
> void intel_gt_driver_late_release(struct intel_gt *gt);
>
> +int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout);
> +
> void intel_gt_check_and_clear_faults(struct intel_gt *gt);
> void intel_gt_clear_error_registers(struct intel_gt *gt,
> intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
> index 647eca9d867a..39f5e824dac5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include "intel_gt_pm.h"
> #include "intel_gt_requests.h"
> #include "intel_timeline.h"
> +#include "uc/intel_uc.h"
Why is this needed?
>
> static bool retire_requests(struct intel_timeline *tl)
> {
> @@ -130,7 +131,8 @@ void intel_engine_fini_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> GEM_BUG_ON(engine->retire);
> }
>
> -long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout)
> +long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout,
> + long *remaining_timeout)
> {
> struct intel_gt_timelines *timelines = >->timelines;
> struct intel_timeline *tl, *tn;
> @@ -195,22 +197,10 @@ out_active: spin_lock(&timelines->lock);
> if (flush_submission(gt, timeout)) /* Wait, there's more! */
> active_count++;
>
> - return active_count ? timeout : 0;
> -}
> -
> -int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout)
> -{
> - /* If the device is asleep, we have no requests outstanding */
> - if (!intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt))
> - return 0;
> -
> - while ((timeout = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, timeout)) > 0) {
> - cond_resched();
> - if (signal_pending(current))
> - return -EINTR;
> - }
> + if (remaining_timeout)
> + *remaining_timeout = timeout;
>
> - return timeout;
> + return active_count ? timeout : 0;
> }
>
> static void retire_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> index fcc30a6e4fe9..51dbe0e3294e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> @@ -6,14 +6,17 @@
> #ifndef INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
> #define INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
>
> +#include <stddef.h>
> +
Why is this needed?
> struct intel_engine_cs;
> struct intel_gt;
> struct intel_timeline;
>
> -long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout);
> +long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout,
> + long *remaining_timeout);
> static inline void intel_gt_retire_requests(struct intel_gt *gt)
> {
> - intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, 0);
> + intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, 0, NULL);
> }
>
> void intel_engine_init_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> @@ -21,8 +24,6 @@ void intel_engine_add_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> struct intel_timeline *tl);
> void intel_engine_fini_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
>
> -int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout);
> -
> void intel_gt_init_requests(struct intel_gt *gt);
> void intel_gt_park_requests(struct intel_gt *gt);
> void intel_gt_unpark_requests(struct intel_gt *gt);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> index 24e7a924134e..22eb1e9cca41 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct intel_guc {
> spinlock_t irq_lock;
> unsigned int msg_enabled_mask;
>
> + atomic_t outstanding_submission_g2h;
> +
> struct {
> void (*reset)(struct intel_guc *guc);
> void (*enable)(struct intel_guc *guc);
> @@ -238,6 +240,8 @@ static inline void intel_guc_disable_msg(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 mask)
> spin_unlock_irq(&guc->irq_lock);
> }
>
> +int intel_guc_wait_for_idle(struct intel_guc *guc, long timeout);
> +
> int intel_guc_reset_engine(struct intel_guc *guc,
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> index a60970e85635..e0f92e28350c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ void intel_guc_ct_init_early(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ct->requests.incoming);
> INIT_WORK(&ct->requests.worker, ct_incoming_request_worker_func);
> tasklet_setup(&ct->receive_tasklet, ct_receive_tasklet_func);
> + init_waitqueue_head(&ct->wq);
> }
>
> static inline const char *guc_ct_buffer_type_to_str(u32 type)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> index 660bf37238e2..ab1b79ab960b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <linux/ktime.h>
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
>
> #include "intel_guc_fwif.h"
>
> @@ -68,6 +69,9 @@ struct intel_guc_ct {
>
> struct tasklet_struct receive_tasklet;
>
> + /** @wq: wait queue for g2h chanenl */
> + wait_queue_head_t wq;
> +
> struct {
> u16 last_fence; /* last fence used to send request */
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index ef24758c4266..d1a28283a9ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -254,6 +254,74 @@ static inline void set_lrc_desc_registered(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 id,
> xa_store_irq(&guc->context_lookup, id, ce, GFP_ATOMIC);
> }
>
> +static int guc_submission_busy_loop(struct intel_guc* guc,
I think this name is misleading. It would be better as
guc_submission_send_busy_loop.
> + const u32 *action,
> + u32 len,
> + u32 g2h_len_dw,
> + bool loop)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw, loop);
> +
> + if (!err && g2h_len_dw)
> + atomic_inc(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int guc_wait_for_pending_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> + atomic_t *wait_var,
> + bool interruptible,
> + long timeout)
> +{
> + const int state = interruptible ?
> + TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE : TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
> + DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +
> + might_sleep();
> + GEM_BUG_ON(timeout < 0);
> +
> + if (!atomic_read(wait_var))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!timeout)
> + return -ETIME;
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + prepare_to_wait(&guc->ct.wq, &wait, state);
> +
> + if (!atomic_read(wait_var))
> + break;
> +
> + if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
> + timeout = -ERESTARTSYS;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!timeout) {
> + timeout = -ETIME;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + timeout = io_schedule_timeout(timeout);
> + }
> + finish_wait(&guc->ct.wq, &wait);
> +
> + return (timeout < 0) ? timeout : 0;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_guc_wait_for_idle(struct intel_guc *guc, long timeout)
> +{
> + bool interruptible = true;
> +
> + if (unlikely(timeout < 0))
> + timeout = -timeout, interruptible = false;
Why is this a comma bridged statement rather than just two lines with
braces on the if?
And overloading negative timeouts to mean non-interruptible seems
unnecessarily convoluted in the first place. Why not just have an
interruptible parameter? I'm also not seeing how the timeout gets to be
negative in the first place?
> +
> + return guc_wait_for_pending_msg(guc, &guc->outstanding_submission_g2h,
> + interruptible, timeout);
> +}
> +
> static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
> {
> int err;
> @@ -280,6 +348,7 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
>
> err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw);
> if (!enabled && !err) {
> + atomic_inc(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h);
> set_context_enabled(ce);
> } else if (!enabled) {
> clr_context_pending_enable(ce);
> @@ -731,7 +800,7 @@ static int __guc_action_register_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
> offset,
> };
>
> - return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, true);
> + return guc_submission_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, true);
> }
>
> static int register_context(struct intel_context *ce)
> @@ -751,7 +820,7 @@ static int __guc_action_deregister_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
> guc_id,
> };
>
> - return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> + return guc_submission_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> G2H_LEN_DW_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT, true);
> }
>
> @@ -868,7 +937,9 @@ static int guc_context_pin(struct intel_context *ce, void *vaddr)
>
> static void guc_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> {
> - unpin_guc_id(ce_to_guc(ce), ce);
> + struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> +
> + unpin_guc_id(guc, ce);
Should this be part of this patch?
> lrc_unpin(ce);
> }
>
> @@ -891,7 +962,7 @@ static void __guc_context_sched_disable(struct intel_guc *guc,
>
> intel_context_get(ce);
>
> - intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> + guc_submission_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> G2H_LEN_DW_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET, true);
> }
>
> @@ -1433,6 +1504,12 @@ g2h_context_lookup(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 desc_idx)
> return ce;
> }
>
> +static void decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(struct intel_guc *guc)
> +{
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h))
> + wake_up_all(&guc->ct.wq);
> +}
> +
> int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> const u32 *msg,
> u32 len)
> @@ -1468,6 +1545,8 @@ int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> lrc_destroy(&ce->ref);
> }
>
> + decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(guc);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1516,6 +1595,7 @@ int intel_guc_sched_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
> }
>
> + decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(guc);
> intel_context_put(ce);
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> index 9c954c589edf..c4cef885e984 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,11 @@ uc_state_checkers(guc, guc_submission);
> #undef uc_state_checkers
> #undef __uc_state_checker
>
> +static inline int intel_uc_wait_for_idle(struct intel_uc *uc, long timeout)
> +{
> + return intel_guc_wait_for_idle(&uc->guc, timeout);
> +}
> +
> #define intel_uc_ops_function(_NAME, _OPS, _TYPE, _RET) \
> static inline _TYPE intel_uc_##_NAME(struct intel_uc *uc) \
> { \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index cc745751ac53..277800987bf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include "gt/intel_gt_clock_utils.h"
> #include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> #include "gt/intel_gt_pm.h"
> +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
All of these extra includes seem incorrect. There is no code change in
any of the files below that would warrant a new include.
John.
> #include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
> #include "gt/intel_reset.h"
> #include "gt/intel_rc6.h"
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> index 4d2d59a9942b..2b73ddb11c66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> */
>
> #include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
> +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> #include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
>
> #include "i915_drv.h"
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c
> index c130010a7033..1c721542e277 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> */
>
> #include "i915_drv.h"
> -#include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
> +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
>
> #include "../i915_selftest.h"
> #include "igt_flush_test.h"
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> index d189c4bd4bef..4f8180146888 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ void mock_device_flush(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> do {
> for_each_engine(engine, gt, id)
> mock_engine_flush(engine);
> - } while (intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT));
> + } while (intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT,
> + NULL));
> }
>
> static void mock_device_release(struct drm_device *dev)
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list