[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/51] drm/i915/guc: Connect reset modparam updates to GuC policy flags

[Matthew Brost]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 01:17:12PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> 
> Changing the reset module parameter has no effect on a running GuC.
> The corresponding entry in the ADS must be updated and then the GuC
> informed via a Host2GuC message.
> 
> The new debugfs interface to module parameters allows this to happen.
> However, connecting the parameter data address back to anything useful
> is messy. One option would be to pass a new private data structure
> address through instead of just the parameter pointer. However, that
> means having a new (and different) data structure for each parameter
> and a new (and different) write function for each parameter. This
> method keeps everything generic by instead using a string lookup on
> the directory entry name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <john.c.harrison at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs_params.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
> index 2ad5fcd4e1b7..c6d0b762d82c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int guc_action_policies_update(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 policy_offset)
>  		policy_offset
>  	};
>  
> -	return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
> +	return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, true);
>  }
>  
>  int intel_guc_global_policies_update(struct intel_guc *guc)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs_params.c
> index 4e2b077692cb..8ecd8b42f048 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs_params.c
> @@ -6,9 +6,20 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  
>  #include "i915_debugfs_params.h"
> +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> +#include "gt/uc/intel_guc.h"
>  #include "i915_drv.h"
>  #include "i915_params.h"
>  
> +#define MATCH_DEBUGFS_NODE_NAME(_file, _name)	(strcmp((_file)->f_path.dentry->d_name.name, (_name)) == 0)
> +
> +#define GET_I915(i915, name, ptr)	\
> +	do {	\
> +		struct i915_params *params;	\
> +		params = container_of(((void *) (ptr)), typeof(*params), name);	\
> +		(i915) = container_of(params, typeof(*(i915)), params);	\
> +	} while(0)
> +
>  /* int param */
>  static int i915_param_int_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  {
> @@ -24,6 +35,16 @@ static int i915_param_int_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	return single_open(file, i915_param_int_show, inode->i_private);
>  }
>  
> +static int notify_guc(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(&i915->gt.uc))
> +		ret = intel_guc_global_policies_update(&i915->gt.uc.guc);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t i915_param_int_write(struct file *file,
>  				    const char __user *ubuf, size_t len,
>  				    loff_t *offp)
> @@ -81,8 +102,10 @@ static ssize_t i915_param_uint_write(struct file *file,
>  				     const char __user *ubuf, size_t len,
>  				     loff_t *offp)
>  {
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915;
>  	struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
>  	unsigned int *value = m->private;
> +	unsigned int old = *value;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = kstrtouint_from_user(ubuf, len, 0, value);
> @@ -95,6 +118,14 @@ static ssize_t i915_param_uint_write(struct file *file,
>  			*value = b;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!ret && MATCH_DEBUGFS_NODE_NAME(file, "reset")) {
> +		GET_I915(i915, reset, value);
> +
> +		ret = notify_guc(i915);
> +		if (ret)
> +			*value = old;
> +	}
> +
>  	return ret ?: len;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.28.0
>