[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/47] drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC
Matthew Brost
matthew.brost at intel.com
Sat Jul 17 04:09:27 UTC 2021
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 03:55:02AM +0000, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 05:16:34PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> > On 6/24/2021 00:04, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > When running the GuC the GPU can't be considered idle if the GuC still
> > > has contexts pinned. As such, a call has been added in
> > > intel_gt_wait_for_idle to idle the UC and in turn the GuC by waiting for
> > > the number of unpinned contexts to go to zero.
> > >
> > > v2: rtimeout -> remaining_timeout
> > >
> > > Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 3 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 19 ++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 2 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c | 22 ++---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h | 9 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 4 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h | 4 +
> > > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h | 5 ++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c | 1 +
> > > .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c | 2 +-
> > > .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c | 3 +-
> > > 14 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> > > index 2fd155742bd2..335b955d5b4b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> > > @@ -644,7 +644,8 @@ mmap_offset_attach(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > > goto insert;
> > > /* Attempt to reap some mmap space from dead objects */
> > > - err = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(&i915->gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> > > + err = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(&i915->gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT,
> > > + NULL);
> > > if (err)
> > > goto err;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> > > index e714e21c0a4d..acfdd53b2678 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> > > @@ -585,6 +585,25 @@ static void __intel_gt_disable(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > > GEM_BUG_ON(intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt));
> > > }
> > > +int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout)
> > > +{
> > > + long remaining_timeout;
> > > +
> > > + /* If the device is asleep, we have no requests outstanding */
> > > + if (!intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt))
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + while ((timeout = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, timeout,
> > > + &remaining_timeout)) > 0) {
> > > + cond_resched();
> > > + if (signal_pending(current))
> > > + return -EINTR;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return timeout ? timeout : intel_uc_wait_for_idle(>->uc,
> > > + remaining_timeout);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int intel_gt_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > > {
> > > int err;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> > > index e7aabe0cc5bf..74e771871a9b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> > > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ void intel_gt_driver_release(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > > void intel_gt_driver_late_release(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > > +int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout);
> > > +
> > > void intel_gt_check_and_clear_faults(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > > void intel_gt_clear_error_registers(struct intel_gt *gt,
> > > intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
> > > index 647eca9d867a..39f5e824dac5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
> > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > > #include "intel_gt_pm.h"
> > > #include "intel_gt_requests.h"
> > > #include "intel_timeline.h"
> > > +#include "uc/intel_uc.h"
> > Why is this needed?
> >
>
> It is not, likely holdover from internal churn.
>
> > > static bool retire_requests(struct intel_timeline *tl)
> > > {
> > > @@ -130,7 +131,8 @@ void intel_engine_fini_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > > GEM_BUG_ON(engine->retire);
> > > }
> > > -long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout)
> > > +long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout,
> > > + long *remaining_timeout)
> > > {
> > > struct intel_gt_timelines *timelines = >->timelines;
> > > struct intel_timeline *tl, *tn;
> > > @@ -195,22 +197,10 @@ out_active: spin_lock(&timelines->lock);
> > > if (flush_submission(gt, timeout)) /* Wait, there's more! */
> > > active_count++;
> > > - return active_count ? timeout : 0;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout)
> > > -{
> > > - /* If the device is asleep, we have no requests outstanding */
> > > - if (!intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt))
> > > - return 0;
> > > -
> > > - while ((timeout = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, timeout)) > 0) {
> > > - cond_resched();
> > > - if (signal_pending(current))
> > > - return -EINTR;
> > > - }
> > > + if (remaining_timeout)
> > > + *remaining_timeout = timeout;
> > > - return timeout;
> > > + return active_count ? timeout : 0;
> > > }
> > > static void retire_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > index fcc30a6e4fe9..51dbe0e3294e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > > @@ -6,14 +6,17 @@
> > > #ifndef INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
> > > #define INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
> > > +#include <stddef.h>
> > > +
> > Why is this needed?
> >
>
> I swear I needed stddef.h for NULL on a different machice of mine. It
> seems to be quite happy without it on my current machine. Can remove.
>
And it in fact does need to be included. See CI results below:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91840/#rev3
Matt
> > > struct intel_engine_cs;
> > > struct intel_gt;
> > > struct intel_timeline;
> > > -long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout);
> > > +long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout,
> > > + long *remaining_timeout);
> > > static inline void intel_gt_retire_requests(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > > {
> > > - intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, 0);
> > > + intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, 0, NULL);
> > > }
> > > void intel_engine_init_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> > > @@ -21,8 +24,6 @@ void intel_engine_add_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> > > struct intel_timeline *tl);
> > > void intel_engine_fini_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> > > -int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout);
> > > -
> > > void intel_gt_init_requests(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > > void intel_gt_park_requests(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > > void intel_gt_unpark_requests(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > > index 24e7a924134e..22eb1e9cca41 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct intel_guc {
> > > spinlock_t irq_lock;
> > > unsigned int msg_enabled_mask;
> > > + atomic_t outstanding_submission_g2h;
> > > +
> > > struct {
> > > void (*reset)(struct intel_guc *guc);
> > > void (*enable)(struct intel_guc *guc);
> > > @@ -238,6 +240,8 @@ static inline void intel_guc_disable_msg(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 mask)
> > > spin_unlock_irq(&guc->irq_lock);
> > > }
> > > +int intel_guc_wait_for_idle(struct intel_guc *guc, long timeout);
> > > +
> > > int intel_guc_reset_engine(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > > struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > > index a60970e85635..e0f92e28350c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ void intel_guc_ct_init_early(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
> > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ct->requests.incoming);
> > > INIT_WORK(&ct->requests.worker, ct_incoming_request_worker_func);
> > > tasklet_setup(&ct->receive_tasklet, ct_receive_tasklet_func);
> > > + init_waitqueue_head(&ct->wq);
> > > }
> > > static inline const char *guc_ct_buffer_type_to_str(u32 type)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> > > index 660bf37238e2..ab1b79ab960b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > > #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > > #include <linux/ktime.h>
> > > +#include <linux/wait.h>
> > > #include "intel_guc_fwif.h"
> > > @@ -68,6 +69,9 @@ struct intel_guc_ct {
> > > struct tasklet_struct receive_tasklet;
> > > + /** @wq: wait queue for g2h chanenl */
> > > + wait_queue_head_t wq;
> > > +
> > > struct {
> > > u16 last_fence; /* last fence used to send request */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > index ef24758c4266..d1a28283a9ae 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > @@ -254,6 +254,74 @@ static inline void set_lrc_desc_registered(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 id,
> > > xa_store_irq(&guc->context_lookup, id, ce, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > }
> > > +static int guc_submission_busy_loop(struct intel_guc* guc,
> > I think this name is misleading. It would be better as
> > guc_submission_send_busy_loop.
> >
>
> Yep, better name. Will fix.
>
> > > + const u32 *action,
> > > + u32 len,
> > > + u32 g2h_len_dw,
> > > + bool loop)
> > > +{
> > > + int err;
> > > +
> > > + err = intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw, loop);
> > > +
> > > + if (!err && g2h_len_dw)
> > > + atomic_inc(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h);
> > > +
> > > + return err;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int guc_wait_for_pending_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > > + atomic_t *wait_var,
> > > + bool interruptible,
> > > + long timeout)
> > > +{
> > > + const int state = interruptible ?
> > > + TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE : TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
> > > + DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> > > +
> > > + might_sleep();
> > > + GEM_BUG_ON(timeout < 0);
> > > +
> > > + if (!atomic_read(wait_var))
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (!timeout)
> > > + return -ETIME;
> > > +
> > > + for (;;) {
> > > + prepare_to_wait(&guc->ct.wq, &wait, state);
> > > +
> > > + if (!atomic_read(wait_var))
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > + if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
> > > + timeout = -ERESTARTSYS;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (!timeout) {
> > > + timeout = -ETIME;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + timeout = io_schedule_timeout(timeout);
> > > + }
> > > + finish_wait(&guc->ct.wq, &wait);
> > > +
> > > + return (timeout < 0) ? timeout : 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int intel_guc_wait_for_idle(struct intel_guc *guc, long timeout)
> > > +{
> > > + bool interruptible = true;
> > > +
> > > + if (unlikely(timeout < 0))
> > > + timeout = -timeout, interruptible = false;
> > Why is this a comma bridged statement rather than just two lines with braces
> > on the if?
> >
> > And overloading negative timeouts to mean non-interruptible seems
> > unnecessarily convoluted in the first place. Why not just have an
> > interruptible parameter? I'm also not seeing how the timeout gets to be
> > negative in the first place?
> >
>
> Copy paste from some other code, can remove the comma and replace with 2
> lines.
>
> This is how intel_gt_wait_for_idle works which in turn calls this. Not
> saying the negative parameter meaning something special is right, just
> how it is currently done. Now that you mention this with the
> remaining_timeout I may have broken this too. How about I just add
> parameter than this convoluted sceme as you suggest.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + return guc_wait_for_pending_msg(guc, &guc->outstanding_submission_g2h,
> > > + interruptible, timeout);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
> > > {
> > > int err;
> > > @@ -280,6 +348,7 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
> > > err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw);
> > > if (!enabled && !err) {
> > > + atomic_inc(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h);
> > > set_context_enabled(ce);
> > > } else if (!enabled) {
> > > clr_context_pending_enable(ce);
> > > @@ -731,7 +800,7 @@ static int __guc_action_register_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > > offset,
> > > };
> > > - return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, true);
> > > + return guc_submission_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, true);
> > > }
> > > static int register_context(struct intel_context *ce)
> > > @@ -751,7 +820,7 @@ static int __guc_action_deregister_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > > guc_id,
> > > };
> > > - return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> > > + return guc_submission_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> > > G2H_LEN_DW_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT, true);
> > > }
> > > @@ -868,7 +937,9 @@ static int guc_context_pin(struct intel_context *ce, void *vaddr)
> > > static void guc_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> > > {
> > > - unpin_guc_id(ce_to_guc(ce), ce);
> > > + struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> > > +
> > > + unpin_guc_id(guc, ce);
> > Should this be part of this patch?
> >
>
> Not likely. Let me see what is going on here.
>
> > > lrc_unpin(ce);
> > > }
> > > @@ -891,7 +962,7 @@ static void __guc_context_sched_disable(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > > intel_context_get(ce);
> > > - intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> > > + guc_submission_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> > > G2H_LEN_DW_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET, true);
> > > }
> > > @@ -1433,6 +1504,12 @@ g2h_context_lookup(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 desc_idx)
> > > return ce;
> > > }
> > > +static void decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > > +{
> > > + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h))
> > > + wake_up_all(&guc->ct.wq);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > > const u32 *msg,
> > > u32 len)
> > > @@ -1468,6 +1545,8 @@ int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > > lrc_destroy(&ce->ref);
> > > }
> > > + decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(guc);
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -1516,6 +1595,7 @@ int intel_guc_sched_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
> > > }
> > > + decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(guc);
> > > intel_context_put(ce);
> > > return 0;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> > > index 9c954c589edf..c4cef885e984 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> > > @@ -81,6 +81,11 @@ uc_state_checkers(guc, guc_submission);
> > > #undef uc_state_checkers
> > > #undef __uc_state_checker
> > > +static inline int intel_uc_wait_for_idle(struct intel_uc *uc, long timeout)
> > > +{
> > > + return intel_guc_wait_for_idle(&uc->guc, timeout);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > #define intel_uc_ops_function(_NAME, _OPS, _TYPE, _RET) \
> > > static inline _TYPE intel_uc_##_NAME(struct intel_uc *uc) \
> > > { \
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > index cc745751ac53..277800987bf8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> > > #include "gt/intel_gt_clock_utils.h"
> > > #include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> > > #include "gt/intel_gt_pm.h"
> > > +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> > All of these extra includes seem incorrect. There is no code change in any
> > of the files below that would warrant a new include.
> >
>
> Well this is surely wrong as it is included two lines above. Will fix.
>
> Matt
>
> > John.
> >
> >
> > > #include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
> > > #include "gt/intel_reset.h"
> > > #include "gt/intel_rc6.h"
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> > > index 4d2d59a9942b..2b73ddb11c66 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> > > */
> > > #include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
> > > +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> > > #include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
> > > #include "i915_drv.h"
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c
> > > index c130010a7033..1c721542e277 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c
> > > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> > > */
> > > #include "i915_drv.h"
> > > -#include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
> > > +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> > > #include "../i915_selftest.h"
> > > #include "igt_flush_test.h"
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> > > index d189c4bd4bef..4f8180146888 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> > > @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ void mock_device_flush(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > > do {
> > > for_each_engine(engine, gt, id)
> > > mock_engine_flush(engine);
> > > - } while (intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT));
> > > + } while (intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT,
> > > + NULL));
> > > }
> > > static void mock_device_release(struct drm_device *dev)
> >
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list