[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/gt: nuke gen6_hw_id
Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Wed Jul 21 18:44:22 UTC 2021
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:25:59AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
>On 21/07/2021 00:20, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>This is only used by GRAPHICS_VER == 6 and GRAPHICS_VER == 7. All other
>>recent platforms do not depend on this field, so it doesn't make much
>>sense to keep it generic like that. Instead, just do a mapping from
>>engine class to HW ID in the single place that is needed.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>>---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 6 ------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h | 8 --------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 +++-
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>>index 508221de411c..0a04e8d90e9e 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>>@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
>> #define MAX_MMIO_BASES 3
>> struct engine_info {
>>- u8 gen6_hw_id;
>> u8 class;
>> u8 instance;
>> /* mmio bases table *must* be sorted in reverse graphics_ver order */
>>@@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ struct engine_info {
>> static const struct engine_info intel_engines[] = {
>> [RCS0] = {
>>- .gen6_hw_id = RCS0_HW,
>> .class = RENDER_CLASS,
>> .instance = 0,
>> .mmio_bases = {
>>@@ -62,7 +60,6 @@ static const struct engine_info intel_engines[] = {
>> },
>> },
>> [BCS0] = {
>>- .gen6_hw_id = BCS0_HW,
>> .class = COPY_ENGINE_CLASS,
>> .instance = 0,
>> .mmio_bases = {
>>@@ -70,7 +67,6 @@ static const struct engine_info intel_engines[] = {
>> },
>> },
>> [VCS0] = {
>>- .gen6_hw_id = VCS0_HW,
>> .class = VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS,
>> .instance = 0,
>> .mmio_bases = {
>>@@ -102,7 +98,6 @@ static const struct engine_info intel_engines[] = {
>> },
>> },
>> [VECS0] = {
>>- .gen6_hw_id = VECS0_HW,
>> .class = VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS,
>> .instance = 0,
>> .mmio_bases = {
>>@@ -290,7 +285,6 @@ static int intel_engine_setup(struct intel_gt *gt, enum intel_engine_id id)
>> engine->i915 = i915;
>> engine->gt = gt;
>> engine->uncore = gt->uncore;
>>- engine->gen6_hw_id = info->gen6_hw_id;
>> guc_class = engine_class_to_guc_class(info->class);
>> engine->guc_id = MAKE_GUC_ID(guc_class, info->instance);
>> engine->mmio_base = __engine_mmio_base(i915, info->mmio_bases);
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
>>index 266422d8d1b1..64330bfb7641 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
>>@@ -28,13 +28,6 @@
>> #include "intel_wakeref.h"
>> #include "intel_workarounds_types.h"
>>-/* Legacy HW Engine ID */
>>-
>>-#define RCS0_HW 0
>>-#define VCS0_HW 1
>>-#define BCS0_HW 2
>>-#define VECS0_HW 3
>>-
>> /* Gen11+ HW Engine class + instance */
>> #define RENDER_CLASS 0
>> #define VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS 1
>>@@ -268,7 +261,6 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
>> intel_engine_mask_t mask;
>>- u8 gen6_hw_id;
>> u8 class;
>> u8 instance;
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>index 8750ffce9d61..d91386f4828e 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>@@ -2572,7 +2572,9 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
>> #define ARB_MODE_BWGTLB_DISABLE (1 << 9)
>> #define ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_BDW (1 << 1)
>> #define RENDER_HWS_PGA_GEN7 _MMIO(0x04080)
>>-#define RING_FAULT_REG(engine) _MMIO(0x4094 + 0x100 * (engine)->gen6_hw_id)
>>+
>>+#define _GEN6_ENGINE_CLASS_TO_ID(class) _PICK((class), 0, 1, 3, 2)
>>+#define RING_FAULT_REG(engine) _MMIO(0x4094 + 0x100 * _GEN6_ENGINE_CLASS_TO_ID((engine)->class))
>
>Makes sense to me.
>
>Maybe HW_ID and HW_CLASS in the macro name? Not sure.
I can do that... I think I avoided it because it makes the macro
very big. Anyway, this should be called in just one place, so it doesn't
matter much... I can add it.
>
>Only open I have is why the "Gen11+ HW Engine class + instance"
>comment and now we would tie that, allegedly Gen11 concept, with
>Gen6-7. Care to do some digging?
Not sure. This comes from 3d7b3039741d ("drm/i915: Move engine IDs out of i915_reg.h")
that I reviewed :-o
Cc'ing Daniele. I don't see "class" as a Gen11+ thing. Is it just that
those numbers started to make sense for gen11? Since
a) we are using the class even for GRAPHICS_VER < 11
b) the legacy HW IDs shouldn't be used anywhere else anymore
we could
1) move the legacy defines back to i915_reg.h
2) use them in the macro above (IMO would slightly improve the
readability of that _PICK() call)
3) Remove the "Gen11+" comment in the _CLASS macros to avoid
misunderstandings
Thoughts?
thanks
Lucas De Marchi
>
>Regards,
>
>Tvrtko
>
>> #define GEN8_RING_FAULT_REG _MMIO(0x4094)
>> #define GEN12_RING_FAULT_REG _MMIO(0xcec4)
>> #define GEN8_RING_FAULT_ENGINE_ID(x) (((x) >> 12) & 0x7)
>>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list