[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/30] drm/i915/xehp: handle new steering options
Yokoyama, Caz
caz.yokoyama at intel.com
Tue Jul 27 19:11:47 UTC 2021
On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 10:42 -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
>
> Xe_HP is more modular then its predecessors and as a consequence it
then -> than
> has
> more types of replicated registers. As with l3bank regions on
> previous
> platforms, we may need to explicitly re-steer accesses to these new
> types of ranges at runtime if we can't find a single default steering
> value that satisfies the fusing of all types.
>
> Bspec: 66534
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <
> daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 40 ++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 7 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c | 18 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h | 6 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 89
> +++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 1 +
> 11 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> index 46441607d18b..0ee33a31a3cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,13 @@ static const struct intel_mmio_range
> icl_l3bank_steering_table[] = {
> {},
> };
>
> +static u16 slicemask(struct intel_gt *gt, int count)
> +{
> + u64 dss_mask = intel_sseu_get_subslices(>->info.sseu, 0);
> +
> + return intel_slicemask_from_dssmask(dss_mask, count);
> +}
> +
> int intel_gt_init_mmio(struct intel_gt *gt)
> {
> intel_gt_init_clock_frequency(gt);
> @@ -96,11 +103,24 @@ int intel_gt_init_mmio(struct intel_gt *gt)
> intel_uc_init_mmio(>->uc);
> intel_sseu_info_init(gt);
>
> - if (GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915) >= 11) {
> + /*
> + * An mslice is unavailable only if both the meml3 for the
> slice is
> + * disabled *and* all of the DSS in the slice (quadrant) are
> disabled.
> + */
> + if (HAS_MSLICES(gt->i915))
> + gt->info.mslice_mask =
> + slicemask(gt, GEN_DSS_PER_MSLICE) |
> + (intel_uncore_read(gt->uncore,
> GEN10_MIRROR_FUSE3) &
> + GEN12_MEML3_EN_MASK);
> +
> + if (GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915) >= 11 &&
> + GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(gt->i915) < IP_VER(12, 50)) {
gt->i915 is referenced many times. It is better to define
i915 = gt->i915;
> gt->steering_table[L3BANK] = icl_l3bank_steering_table;
> gt->info.l3bank_mask =
> ~intel_uncore_read(gt->uncore,
> GEN10_MIRROR_FUSE3) &
> GEN10_L3BANK_MASK;
> + } else if (HAS_MSLICES(gt->i915)) {
> + MISSING_CASE(INTEL_INFO(gt->i915)->platform);
> }
>
> return intel_engines_init_mmio(gt);
> @@ -785,6 +805,24 @@ static void intel_gt_get_valid_steering(struct
> intel_gt *gt,
> *sliceid = 0; /* unused */
> *subsliceid = __ffs(gt->info.l3bank_mask);
> break;
> + case MSLICE:
> + GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON(!gt->info.mslice_mask); /* should be
> impossible! */
> +
> + *sliceid = __ffs(gt->info.mslice_mask);
> + *subsliceid = 0; /* unused */
> + break;
> + case LNCF:
> + GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON(!gt->info.mslice_mask); /* should be
> impossible! */
> +
> + /*
> + * 0xFDC[29:28] selects the mslice to steer to and
> 0xFDC[27]
> + * selects which LNCF within the mslice to steer
> to. An LNCF
> + * is always present if its mslice is present, so we
> can safely
> + * just steer to LNCF 0 in all cases.
> + */
> + *sliceid = __ffs(gt->info.mslice_mask) << 1;
> + *subsliceid = 0; /* unused */
> + break;
> default:
> MISSING_CASE(type);
> *sliceid = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> index 74e771871a9b..24b78398a587 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static inline bool
> intel_gt_needs_read_steering(struct intel_gt *gt,
> }
>
> u32 intel_gt_read_register_fw(struct intel_gt *gt, i915_reg_t reg);
> +u32 intel_gt_read_register(struct intel_gt *gt, i915_reg_t reg);
Shoulde this function declaration be included in this patch? I don't
find corresponding body in this patch.
-caz
>
> void intel_gt_info_print(const struct intel_gt_info *info,
> struct drm_printer *p);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> index 97a5075288d2..a81e21bf1bd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> @@ -47,9 +47,14 @@ struct intel_mmio_range {
> * of multicast registers. If another type of steering does not
> have any
> * overlap in valid steering targets with 'subslice' style
> registers, we will
> * need to explicitly re-steer reads of registers of the other type.
> + *
> + * Only the replication types that may need additional non-default
> steering
> + * are listed here.
> */
> enum intel_steering_type {
> L3BANK,
> + MSLICE,
> + LNCF,
>
> NUM_STEERING_TYPES
> };
> @@ -184,6 +189,8 @@ struct intel_gt {
>
> /* Slice/subslice/EU info */
> struct sseu_dev_info sseu;
> +
> + unsigned long mslice_mask;
> } info;
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
> index e3a2a2fa5f94..a74b72f50cc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include "gem/i915_gem_lmem.h"
> #include "gem/i915_gem_region.h"
> #include "gem/i915_gem_ttm.h"
> +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
>
> static int init_fake_lmem_bar(struct intel_memory_region *mem)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> index 367fd44b81c8..bbed8e8625e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> @@ -759,3 +759,21 @@ void intel_sseu_print_topology(const struct
> sseu_dev_info *sseu,
> }
> }
> }
> +
> +u16 intel_slicemask_from_dssmask(u64 dss_mask, int dss_per_slice)
> +{
> + u16 slice_mask = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + WARN_ON(sizeof(dss_mask) * 8 / dss_per_slice > 8 *
> sizeof(slice_mask));
> +
> + for (i = 0; dss_mask; i++) {
> + if (dss_mask & GENMASK(dss_per_slice - 1, 0))
> + slice_mask |= BIT(i);
> +
> + dss_mask >>= dss_per_slice;
> + }
> +
> + return slice_mask;
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> index 4cd1a8a7298a..1073471d1980 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ struct drm_printer;
> #define GEN_MAX_EUS (16) /* TGL upper bound */
> #define GEN_MAX_EU_STRIDE GEN_SSEU_STRIDE(GEN_MAX_EUS)
>
> +#define GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE 4
> +#define GEN_DSS_PER_CSLICE 8
> +#define GEN_DSS_PER_MSLICE 8
> +
> struct sseu_dev_info {
> u8 slice_mask;
> u8 subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES * GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE];
> @@ -104,4 +108,6 @@ void intel_sseu_dump(const struct sseu_dev_info
> *sseu, struct drm_printer *p);
> void intel_sseu_print_topology(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
> struct drm_printer *p);
>
> +u16 intel_slicemask_from_dssmask(u64 dss_mask, int dss_per_slice);
> +
> #endif /* __INTEL_SSEU_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> index 3aa5ce3cda8b..48f794f4a1af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> @@ -888,12 +888,24 @@ cfl_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private
> *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
> }
>
> +static void __add_mcr_wa(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct
> i915_wa_list *wal,
> + unsigned slice, unsigned subslice)
> +{
> + u32 mcr, mcr_mask;
> +
> + mcr = GEN11_MCR_SLICE(slice) | GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice);
> + mcr_mask = GEN11_MCR_SLICE_MASK | GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK;
> +
> + drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "MCR slice/subslice = %x\n", mcr);
> +
> + wa_write_clr_set(wal, GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr_mask, mcr);
> +}
> +
> static void
> icl_wa_init_mcr(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list
> *wal)
> {
> const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu = &i915->gt.info.sseu;
> unsigned int slice, subslice;
> - u32 mcr, mcr_mask;
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 11);
> GEM_BUG_ON(hweight8(sseu->slice_mask) > 1);
> @@ -918,12 +930,79 @@ icl_wa_init_mcr(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> if (i915->gt.info.l3bank_mask & BIT(subslice))
> i915->gt.steering_table[L3BANK] = NULL;
>
> - mcr = GEN11_MCR_SLICE(slice) | GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice);
> - mcr_mask = GEN11_MCR_SLICE_MASK | GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK;
> + __add_mcr_wa(i915, wal, slice, subslice);
> +}
>
> - drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "MCR slice/subslice = %x\n", mcr);
> +__maybe_unused
> +static void
> +xehp_init_mcr(struct intel_gt *gt, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> + const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu = >->info.sseu;
> + unsigned long slice, subslice = 0, slice_mask = 0;
> + u64 dss_mask = 0;
> + u32 lncf_mask = 0;
> + int i;
>
> - wa_write_clr_set(wal, GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr_mask, mcr);
> + /*
> + * On Xe_HP the steering increases in complexity. There are now
> several
> + * more units that require steering and we're not guaranteed to
> be able
> + * to find a common setting for all of them. These are:
> + * - GSLICE (fusable)
> + * - DSS (sub-unit within gslice; fusable)
> + * - L3 Bank (fusable)
> + * - MSLICE (fusable)
> + * - LNCF (sub-unit within mslice; always present if mslice is
> present)
> + * - SQIDI (always on)
> + *
> + * We'll do our default/implicit steering based on GSLICE (in
> the
> + * sliceid field) and DSS (in the subsliceid field). If we can
> + * find overlap between the valid MSLICE and/or LNCF values
> with
> + * a suitable GSLICE, then we can just re-use the default value
> and
> + * skip and explicit steering at runtime.
> + *
> + * We only need to look for overlap between GSLICE/MSLICE/LNCF
> to find
> + * a valid sliceid value. DSS steering is the only type of
> steering
> + * that utilizes the 'subsliceid' bits.
> + *
> + * Also note that, even though the steering domain is called
> "GSlice"
> + * and it is encoded in the register using the gslice format,
> the spec
> + * says that the combined (geometry | compute) fuse should be
> used to
> + * select the steering.
> + */
> +
> + /* Find the potential gslice candidates */
> + dss_mask = intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, 0);
> + slice_mask = intel_slicemask_from_dssmask(dss_mask,
> GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE);
> +
> + /*
> + * Find the potential LNCF candidates. Either LNCF within a
> valid
> + * mslice is fine.
> + */
> + for_each_set_bit(i, >->info.mslice_mask, GEN12_MAX_MSLICES)
> + lncf_mask |= (0x3 << (i * 2));
> +
> + /*
> + * Are there any sliceid values that work for both GSLICE and
> LNCF
> + * steering?
> + */
> + if (slice_mask & lncf_mask) {
> + slice_mask &= lncf_mask;
> + gt->steering_table[LNCF] = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + /* How about sliceid values that also work for MSLICE steering?
> */
> + if (slice_mask & gt->info.mslice_mask) {
> + slice_mask &= gt->info.mslice_mask;
> + gt->steering_table[MSLICE] = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + slice = __ffs(slice_mask);
> + subslice = __ffs(dss_mask >> (slice * GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE));
> + WARN_ON(subslice > GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE);
> + WARN_ON(dss_mask >> (slice * GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE) == 0);
> +
> + __add_mcr_wa(i915, wal, slice, subslice);
> }
>
> static void
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index d44d0050beec..e5b53e298e13 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1696,6 +1696,9 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private
> *i915,
> #define HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)-
> >has_runtime_pm)
> #define HAS_64BIT_RELOC(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)-
> >has_64bit_reloc)
>
> +#define HAS_MSLICES(dev_priv) \
> + (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_mslices)
> +
> #define HAS_IPC(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)-
> >display.has_ipc)
>
> #define HAS_REGION(i915, i) (INTEL_INFO(i915)->memory_regions & (i))
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index f28206484552..d0f18230dae8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -1012,6 +1012,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info
> adl_p_info = {
> .has_llc = 1, \
> .has_logical_ring_contexts = 1, \
> .has_logical_ring_elsq = 1, \
> + .has_mslices = 1, \
> .has_rc6 = 1, \
> .has_reset_engine = 1, \
> .has_rps = 1, \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 1669aa8e1cff..0009833fa033 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -2695,6 +2695,7 @@ static inline bool
> i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
> #define GEN11_MCR_SLICE_MASK GEN11_MCR_SLICE(0xf)
> #define GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice) (((subslice) & 0x7) <<
> 24)
> #define GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE(0x7)
> +#define GEN11_MCR_MULTICAST REG_BIT(31)
> #define RING_IPEIR(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x64)
> #define RING_IPEHR(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x68)
> #define RING_EIR(base) _MMIO((base) + 0xb0)
> @@ -3113,6 +3114,9 @@ static inline bool
> i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
> #define GEN10_MIRROR_FUSE3 _MMIO(0x9118)
> #define GEN10_L3BANK_PAIR_COUNT 4
> #define GEN10_L3BANK_MASK 0x0F
> +/* on Xe_HP the same fuses indicates mslices instead of L3 banks */
> +#define GEN12_MAX_MSLICES 4
> +#define GEN12_MEML3_EN_MASK 0x0F
>
> #define GEN8_EU_DISABLE0 _MMIO(0x9134)
> #define GEN8_EU_DIS0_S0_MASK 0xffffff
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index 121d6d9afd3a..2177372f9ac3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ enum intel_ppgtt_type {
> func(has_llc); \
> func(has_logical_ring_contexts); \
> func(has_logical_ring_elsq); \
> + func(has_mslices); \
> func(has_pooled_eu); \
> func(has_rc6); \
> func(has_rc6p); \
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list