[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2 11/11] tests/i915/gem_exec_fence: use device_coherent mmap
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Wed Jul 28 10:30:41 UTC 2021
We lost explicit WC mmaps on discrete, where we now only support FIXED,
however such mappings should be device coherent. In gem_exec_fence it
looks like we can just use mmap__device_coherent, which should also work
on discrete platforms, while still using an explicit WC mmap on
integrated platforms.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com>
---
tests/i915/gem_exec_fence.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fence.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fence.c
index ef1bb0ca..620e7ac2 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fence.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fence.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static void test_fence_busy(int fd, const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
obj.relocation_count = 1;
memset(&reloc, 0, sizeof(reloc));
- batch = gem_mmap__wc(fd, obj.handle, 0, 4096, PROT_WRITE);
+ batch = gem_mmap__device_coherent(fd, obj.handle, 0, 4096, PROT_WRITE);
gem_set_domain(fd, obj.handle,
I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static void test_fence_busy_all(int fd, const intel_ctx_t *ctx, unsigned flags)
obj.relocation_count = 1;
memset(&reloc, 0, sizeof(reloc));
- batch = gem_mmap__wc(fd, obj.handle, 0, 4096, PROT_WRITE);
+ batch = gem_mmap__device_coherent(fd, obj.handle, 0, 4096, PROT_WRITE);
gem_set_domain(fd, obj.handle,
I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static void test_fence_await(int fd, const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
uint32_t *out;
int i;
- out = gem_mmap__wc(fd, scratch, 0, 4096, PROT_WRITE);
+ out = gem_mmap__device_coherent(fd, scratch, 0, 4096, PROT_WRITE);
gem_set_domain(fd, scratch,
I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static void test_parallel(int i915, const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e2;
const unsigned int gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(i915));
uint32_t scratch = gem_create(i915, 4096);
- uint32_t *out = gem_mmap__wc(i915, scratch, 0, 4096, PROT_READ);
+ uint32_t *out = gem_mmap__device_coherent(i915, scratch, 0, 4096, PROT_READ);
uint32_t handle[I915_EXEC_RING_MASK];
IGT_CORK_FENCE(cork);
igt_spin_t *spin;
@@ -2813,7 +2813,7 @@ static void test_syncobj_timeline_chain_engines(int fd, const intel_ctx_cfg_t *c
gem_sync(fd, ctx.engine_counter_object.handle);
- counter_output = gem_mmap__wc(fd, ctx.engine_counter_object.handle, 0, 4096, PROT_READ);
+ counter_output = gem_mmap__device_coherent(fd, ctx.engine_counter_object.handle, 0, 4096, PROT_READ);
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < ctx.engines.nengines; i++)
igt_debug("engine %i (%s)\t= %016"PRIx64"\n", i,
@@ -2879,7 +2879,7 @@ static void test_syncobj_stationary_timeline_chain_engines(int fd, const intel_c
gem_sync(fd, ctx.engine_counter_object.handle);
- counter_output = gem_mmap__wc(fd, ctx.engine_counter_object.handle, 0, 4096, PROT_READ);
+ counter_output = gem_mmap__device_coherent(fd, ctx.engine_counter_object.handle, 0, 4096, PROT_READ);
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < ctx.engines.nengines; i++)
igt_debug("engine %i (%s)\t= %016"PRIx64"\n", i,
@@ -2940,7 +2940,7 @@ static void test_syncobj_backward_timeline_chain_engines(int fd, const intel_ctx
gem_sync(fd, ctx.engine_counter_object.handle);
- counter_output = gem_mmap__wc(fd, ctx.engine_counter_object.handle, 0, 4096, PROT_READ);
+ counter_output = gem_mmap__device_coherent(fd, ctx.engine_counter_object.handle, 0, 4096, PROT_READ);
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < ctx.engines.nengines; i++)
igt_debug("engine %i (%s)\t= %016"PRIx64"\n", i,
@@ -2963,7 +2963,7 @@ igt_main
i915 = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
igt_require_gem(i915);
igt_require(gem_has_exec_fence(i915));
- gem_require_mmap_wc(i915);
+ gem_require_mmap_device_coherent(i915);
ctx = intel_ctx_create_all_physical(i915);
gem_submission_print_method(i915);
--
2.26.3
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list