[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/gt: replace IS_GEN and friends with IS_GRAPHICS_VER

Matt Roper matthew.d.roper at intel.com
Wed Jun 2 16:00:09 UTC 2021


On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 11:34:39PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 01:39:25PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 12:13:17PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 10:30:55AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 10:15:14AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 09:58:34AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:16:54AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > > > > > This was done by the following semantic patch:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is the commit message here out-of-date?  The cocci doesn't appear to
> > > > > > match the diff anymore.  IS_GRAPHICS_VER() is the range macro now and
> > > > > > IS_GEN is being replaced with a direct "==" comparison.
> > > > >
> > > > > not necessarily, it's included in "and friends...". Maybe rewording to
> > > > > something like "replace gen-based macros with new ver-based ones" would
> > > > > make it clearer?
> > > >
> > > > I mean that running the coccinelle rules below through spatch won't
> > > > generate the code diff here; it would generate a completely different
> > > > patch (that I don't think would build properly either).
> > > 
> > > oh, ok. I fixed the issues in the .cocci and forgot to update the commit
> > > message. Thanks.
> > > 
> > > Lucas De Marchi
> > 
> > Aside from the commit messages needing updated Coccinelle rules, the
> > code deltas look correct to me.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> 
> humn... is that to the series or only this commit?

Sorry, that was meant for the whole series.


Matt

> 
> Lucas De Marchi

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list