[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/20] drm/i915/guc: Start protecting access to CTB descriptors

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:16:24PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> 
> We want to stop using guc.send_mutex while sending CTB messages
> so we have to start protecting access to CTB send descriptor.
> 
> For completeness protect also CTB receive descriptor.
> 
> Add spinlock to struct intel_guc_ct_buffer and start using it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> index cf1fb09ef766..80976fe40fbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ static void ct_incoming_request_worker_func(struct work_struct *w);
>   */
>  void intel_guc_ct_init_early(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>  {
> +	spin_lock_init(&ct->ctbs.send.lock);
> +	spin_lock_init(&ct->ctbs.recv.lock);
>  	spin_lock_init(&ct->requests.lock);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ct->requests.pending);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ct->requests.incoming);
> @@ -476,17 +478,22 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(len & ~GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_MASK);
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!response_buf && response_buf_size);
>  
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
> +
>  	fence = ct_get_next_fence(ct);
>  	request.fence = fence;
>  	request.status = 0;
>  	request.response_len = response_buf_size;
>  	request.response_buf = response_buf;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock(&ct->requests.lock);
>  	list_add_tail(&request.link, &ct->requests.pending);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock(&ct->requests.lock);
>  
>  	err = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
> +
>  	if (unlikely(err))
>  		goto unlink;
>  
> @@ -822,6 +829,7 @@ static int ct_handle_request(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *msg)
>  void intel_guc_ct_event_handler(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>  {
>  	u32 msg[GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_MASK + 1]; /* one extra dw for the header */
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	int err = 0;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!ct->enabled)) {
> @@ -830,7 +838,9 @@ void intel_guc_ct_event_handler(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>  	}
>  
>  	do {
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->ctbs.recv.lock, flags);
>  		err = ct_read(ct, msg);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.recv.lock, flags);
>  		if (err)
>  			break;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> index fc9486779e87..bc52dc479a14 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> @@ -27,11 +27,13 @@ struct intel_guc;
>   * record (command transport buffer descriptor) and the actual buffer which
>   * holds the commands.
>   *
> + * @lock: protects access to the commands buffer and buffer descriptor
>   * @desc: pointer to the buffer descriptor
>   * @cmds: pointer to the commands buffer
>   * @size: size of the commands buffer
>   */
>  struct intel_guc_ct_buffer {
> +	spinlock_t lock;

For struct members inline comments _much_ preferred, since then you can
make them multi-line and actually explain stuff - the header format
strictly speaking also allows multi-line, but not with nice formatting and
so encourages people to lean way too much towards brevity.
Plus it's closer where people look (for big structs).

I guess add that to the kerneldoc cleanup work.
-Daniel

>  	struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc;
>  	u32 *cmds;
>  	u32 size;
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch