[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/ttm: pass along the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS

[Matthew Auld]

On 08/06/2021 08:26, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 19:22 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> Currently we just ignore the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS flag, which is
>> fine since everything is already contiguous with the ttm range
>> manager.
>> However in the next patch we want to switch over to the ttm buddy
>> manager, where allocations are by default not contiguous.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
>> index 73d52df8f2be..0b0fce445e9b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
>> @@ -86,10 +86,18 @@ i915_ttm_select_tt_caching(const struct
>> drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>>   
>>   static void
>>   i915_ttm_place_from_region(const struct intel_memory_region *mr,
>> -                          struct ttm_place *place)
>> +                          struct ttm_place *place,
>> +                          unsigned int flags)
>>   {
>>          memset(place, 0, sizeof(*place));
>>          place->mem_type = intel_region_to_ttm_type(mr);
>> +
>> +       switch(mr->type) {
>> +       case INTEL_MEMORY_LOCAL:
>> +               if (flags & I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS)
>> +                       place->flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS;
>> +               break;
>> +       }
> 
> Do we need to restrict this to INTEL_MEMORY_LOCAL? While it doesn't
> currently make much sense for other memory regions, no point in not
> forwarding for all?

Yeah, don't see why not.

> 
> /Thomas
> 
>