[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/ttm: add ttm_buddy_man
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Tue Jun 8 08:11:05 UTC 2021
On 08/06/2021 08:11, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 19:22 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> Add back our standalone i915_buddy allocator and integrate it into a
>> ttm_resource_manager. This will plug into our ttm backend for
>> managing
>> device local-memory in the next couple of patches.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>
> Since the buddy + selftests have been part of the driver before, I
> didn't review them separately, but for the TTM interface, some minor
> comments below. With those fixed,
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..d7bf37be1932
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2021 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +
>> +#include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h>
>> +#include <drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h>
>> +
>> +#include "i915_ttm_buddy_manager.h"
>> +
>> +#include "i915_buddy.h"
>> +#include "i915_gem.h"
>> +
>> +struct i915_ttm_buddy_manager {
>> + struct ttm_resource_manager manager;
>> + struct i915_buddy_mm mm;
>> + struct list_head reserved;
>> + struct mutex lock;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline struct i915_ttm_buddy_manager *
>
> "inline" shouldn't be needed here.
>
>> +to_buddy_manager(struct ttm_resource_manager *man)
>> +{
>> + return container_of(man, struct i915_ttm_buddy_manager,
>> manager);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int i915_ttm_buddy_man_alloc(struct ttm_resource_manager
>> *man,
>> + struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> + const struct ttm_place *place,
>> + struct ttm_resource **res)
>> +{
>> + struct i915_ttm_buddy_manager *bman = to_buddy_manager(man);
>> + struct i915_ttm_buddy_resource *bman_res;
>> + struct i915_buddy_mm *mm = &bman->mm;
>> + unsigned long n_pages;
>> + unsigned int min_order;
>> + u64 size;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(place->fpfn || place->lpfn);
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(bo->page_alignment < mm->chunk_size);
>> +
>> + bman_res = kzalloc(sizeof(*bman_res), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!bman_res)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + ttm_resource_init(bo, place, &bman_res->base);
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bman_res->blocks);
>> + bman_res->mm = mm;
>> +
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(!bman_res->base.num_pages);
>> + size = bman_res->base.num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + min_order = ilog2(bo->page_alignment) - ilog2(mm-
>>> chunk_size);
>> + if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) {
>> + size = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
>> + min_order = ilog2(size) - ilog2(mm->chunk_size);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (size > mm->size) {
>> + err = -E2BIG;
>> + goto err_free_res;
>> + }
>> +
>> + n_pages = size >> ilog2(mm->chunk_size);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + struct i915_buddy_block *block;
>> + unsigned int order;
>> +
>> + order = fls(n_pages) - 1;
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(order > mm->max_order);
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(order < min_order);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + mutex_lock(&bman->lock);
>> + block = i915_buddy_alloc(mm, order);
>> + mutex_unlock(&bman->lock);
>> + if (!IS_ERR(block))
>> + break;
>> +
>> + if (order-- == min_order) {
>> + err = -ENXIO;
>
> IIRC, TTM relies on -ENOSPC to retry with evictions.
Ah, right. We convert that back to -ENXIO in the upper levels somewhere?
>
>> + goto err_free_blocks;
>> + }
>> + } while (1);
>> +
>> + n_pages -= BIT(order);
>> +
>> + list_add_tail(&block->link, &bman_res->blocks);
>> +
>> + if (!n_pages)
>> + break;
>> + } while (1);
>> +
>> + *res = &bman_res->base;
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_free_blocks:
>> + mutex_lock(&bman->lock);
>> + i915_buddy_free_list(mm, &bman_res->blocks);
>> + mutex_unlock(&bman->lock);
>> +err_free_res:
>> + kfree(bman_res);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>
> /Thomas
>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list