[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 06/14] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_active to add a struct device argument

[Christoph Hellwig]

>  kernel/dma/direct.c                          | 2 +-
>  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c                         | 4 ++--
>  6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c
> index ce6b664b10aa..89a894354263 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int i915_gem_object_get_pages_internal(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>  
>  	max_order = MAX_ORDER;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
> -	if (is_swiotlb_active()) {
> +	if (is_swiotlb_active(obj->base.dev->dev)) {

This is the same device used for DMA mapping in
i915_gem_gtt_prepare_pages, so this looks good.

> index f4c2e46b6fe1..2ca9d9a9e5d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
>  	}
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SWIOTLB) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)
> -	need_swiotlb = is_swiotlb_active();
> +	need_swiotlb = is_swiotlb_active(dev->dev);
>  #endif

This looks good, too.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> index b7a8f3a1921f..0d56985bfe81 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ static int pcifront_connect_and_init_dma(struct pcifront_device *pdev)
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&pcifront_dev_lock);
>  
> -	if (!err && !is_swiotlb_active()) {
> +	if (!err && !is_swiotlb_active(&pdev->xdev->dev)) {

This looks good as well.

So I think the devices are all good.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>