[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Add missing drm parameters to recently added call to drm_dbg_kms()

[Lyude Paul]

It's no problem! We all make mistakes sometimes :), I should have been more
diligent on compile-checking this myself as well

On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 08:20 +0000, Lin, Wayne wrote:
> [Public]
> 
> Really sorry for the mistake that I made and any inconvenience it brought.
> Thanks José and Lyude.
> 
> Regards,
> Wayne
> 
> ________________________________________
> > From: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 03:47
> > To: José Roberto de Souza; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; Lin, Wayne
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Add missing drm parameters to recently
> > added call to drm_dbg_kms()
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> > 
> > Will go ahead and push this to drm-misc-next-fixes, thanks
> > 
> > On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 12:44 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > Commit 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by
> > > ports in stale topology") added to calls to drm_dbg_kms() but it
> > > missed the first parameter, the drm device breaking the build.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by
> > > ports in
> > > stale topology")
> > > Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin at amd.com>
> > > Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> > > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 7 +++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > index 9ac148efd9e43..ad0795afc21cf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > @@ -3389,7 +3389,9 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > >                         mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> > > 
> > >                         if (skip) {
> > > -                               drm_dbg_kms("Virtual channel %d is not
> > > in
> > > current topology\n", i);
> > > +                               drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
> > > +                                           "Virtual channel %d is not
> > > in
> > > current topology\n",
> > > +                                           i);
> > >                                 continue;
> > >                         }
> > >                         /* Validated ports don't matter if we're
> > > releasing
> > > @@ -3404,7 +3406,8 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > >                                                 payload->start_slot =
> > > req_payload.start_slot;
> > >                                                 continue;
> > >                                         } else {
> > > -                                               drm_dbg_kms("Fail:set
> > > payload to invalid sink");
> > > +                                               drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
> > > +                                                           "Fail:set
> > > payload to invalid sink");
> > >                                                 mutex_unlock(&mgr-
> > > > payload_lock);
> > >                                                 return -EINVAL;
> > >                                         }
> > 
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >  Lyude Paul (she/her)
> >  Software Engineer at Red Hat
> 

-- 
Cheers,
 Lyude Paul (she/her)
 Software Engineer at Red Hat