[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/gem: Tiny kernel clarification for drm_gem_fence_array_add

[Christian König]

Am 24.06.21 um 15:32 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:48:54PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>>
>> Am 24.06.21 um 14:41 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:42:50AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>>>> Am 22.06.21 um 18:55 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>>>> Spotted while trying to convert panfrost to these.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>>>> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de>
>>>>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org>
>>>>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
>>>>> Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie>
>>>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 3 +++
>>>>>     1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
>>>>> index ba2e64ed8b47..68deb1de8235 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
>>>>> @@ -1302,6 +1302,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_unlock_reservations);
>>>>>      * @fence_array: array of dma_fence * for the job to block on.
>>>>>      * @fence: the dma_fence to add to the list of dependencies.
>>>>>      *
>>>>> + * This functions consumes the reference for @fence both on success and error
>>>>> + * cases.
>>>>> + *
>>>> Oh, the later is a bit ugly I think. But good to know.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>> Merged to drm-misc-next, thanks for taking a look. Can you perhaps take a
>>> look at the drm/armada patch too, then I think I have reviews/acks for all
>>> of them?
>> What are you talking about? I only see drm/armada patches for the irq stuff
>> Thomas is working on.
> There was one in this series, but Maxime was quicker. I'm going to apply
> all the remaining ones now. After that I'll send out a patch set to add
> some dependency tracking to drm_sched_job so that there's not so much
> copypasta going on there. I stumbled over that when reviewing how we
> handle dependencies.

Do you mean a common container for dma_fence objects a drm_sched_job 
depends on?

Thanks,
Christian.

> -Daniel