[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 14/69] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED for userptr, v2.

[Maarten Lankhorst]

We should not allow this any more, as it will break with the new userptr
implementation, it could still be made to work, but there's no point in
doing so.

Inspection of the beignet opencl driver shows that it's only used
when normal userptr is not available, which means for new kernels
you will need CONFIG_I915_USERPTR.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
index c89cf911fb29..80bc10b4ac74 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	struct i915_mmu_object *mo;
 
 	if (flags & I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED)
-		return capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ? 0 : -EPERM;
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	if (GEM_WARN_ON(!obj->userptr.mm))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -274,13 +274,7 @@ static int
 i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 				    unsigned flags)
 {
-	if ((flags & I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED) == 0)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
-		return -EPERM;
-
-	return 0;
+	return -ENODEV;
 }
 
 static void
-- 
2.30.1